ClaimsJeremy Grantham

“If our 7-year forecast were to turn out right – it just might happen one day – then U.S. equities would return minus 1.4% real per year”

Jeremy Grantham, GMO letter author April 2007 The First Truly Global Bubble (It's Everywhere, In Everything) (GMO)

Prediction Their own work or organisation

GMO's 7-year forecast implies U.S. equities would return minus 1.4% real per year as P/Es and profit margins revert to long-term averages.

Resolved false The record shows it did not happen or was not so.

Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?

The second judge would not resolve this claim; the verdict shown is the first judge's.

Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.

What would count as true or false

This is a prediction that U.S. equities would return about -1.4% real per year over the 7 years from April 2007, judged around April 2014 (calendar 2014 at the latest). Measure: the annualized real (inflation-adjusted, CPI) total return of a broad U.S. large-cap index (S&P 500 or GMO's own U.S. large-cap benchmark) over that period. TRUE: the realized annualized real return lies between -2.4% and -0.4%. MOSTLY TRUE: it is negative but outside that band (above -0.4%, or between -4% and -2.4%). MIXED: it is roughly flat, between 0% and +1%. MOSTLY FALSE: it is between +1% and +3%. FALSE: it is above +3%, or below -4% (well wide of the forecast in the other direction). The hedge ('if', 'it just might happen') does not change the test: the forecast figure is judged against the outcome.

Set before the research began.

Evidence (4)

  1. E1 2007 dollars in 2014: $100 → $114.18 | Inflation Calculator in2013dollars.com (Official Data Foundation / Alioth Finance)

    “| Real Inflation Adjusted | $100 | $147.57 | 47.57% |”
  2. E2 2007 dollars in 2014: $100 → $114.18 | Inflation Calculator in2013dollars.com (Official Data Foundation / Alioth Finance)

    “if we had invested $100 in the S&P 500 index in 2007, our investment would be nominally worth approximately $168.49 in 2014. This is a return on investment of 68.49%, with an absolute return of $68.49 on top of the original $100.”
  3. E3 S&P 500 Returns By Year US500 (Logarithms LLC)

    “| 2008 | -37.00% | 0.11% | -37.07% |”
  4. E4 Market Valuations and Expected Returns - December 4, 2014 Yahoo Finance · 4 December 2014

    “GMO expected US large cap real return is -1.7%.”

Reasoning

E2 is an independent calculator page titled "2007 dollars in 2014: $100 → $114.18". It says $100 put into the S&P 500 in 2007 would be worth about $168.49 in nominal terms by 2014. The same page gives an inflation-adjusted value of $147.57 (E1). That figure matches $168.49 divided by the title's inflation factor of 1.1418, which works out to roughly +5.7% real per year over the 7 years. This is far above the +3% line for a false verdict and well wide of the forecast of −1.4% real per year. The page does not measure the April 2007 to April 2014 window, so the figure is an approximation of the period the criteria set; even so, the 47.57% cumulative real return [E1] is far above what +3% a year over about seven years would produce. E4 shows GMO still forecasting a negative return in late 2014, but that is a new forecast, not the outcome.

Cite this claim

Jeremy Grantham, “GMO's 7-year forecast implies U.S. equities would return minus 1.4% real per year as P/Es and profit margins revert to long-term averages.” (said April 2007). Verdict: resolved false. Reliability API, claim c_cedf85f3a6e5, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_cedf85f3a6e5

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Jeremy Grantham, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

More prediction claims by Jeremy Grantham

  1. Resolved false Prediction January 2023
    “we can conclude that the final low for this market might be well into 2024.”

    The final low of this bear market might come well into 2024.

  2. Mixed Prediction January 2023
    “near certainty it was a year ago, is much more likely than not.”

    A continued market decline of at least substantial proportions is much more likely than not.

  3. Mostly false Prediction January 2023
    “after a bloodbath is not unusual and may very well not outlive January.”

    The January 2023 rally may well not outlive January.

  4. Mostly true Prediction January 2023
    “may help to support the market for a few more months.”

    The Presidential Cycle's positive influence may help support the market for a few more months.

  5. Resolved true Prediction 31 August 2022
    “Each cycle is different and unique—but every historical parallel suggests that the worst is yet to come.”

    Grantham says historical parallels suggest the worst of the current market downturn is still to come.

All of them

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.