GMO's seven-year forecast suggests a global equity portfolio can be built returning just over 6% a year plus inflation.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
What would count as true or false
A claim about what GMO's own forecast said at the time (July 2010). True: GMO's seven-year asset class forecast published then (Exhibit 1 of the letter or the matching GMO forecast) implies that a global equity portfolio could be built with an expected real return just over 6% a year (about 6.0%–7.0% real). Mostly true: the implied figure is about 6% real but slightly outside 'just over' (e.g. 5.8%–5.99% or 7.0%–7.5%). Mixed: the forecast supports the figure only for some reasonable portfolio constructions. Mostly false: the implied global equity real return is clearly different (e.g. 5%–5.8% or 7.5%–8.5%). False: the forecast implies a global equity real return far from 6% (below 5% or above 8.5%) or does not support the statement. Later realised returns do not affect the verdict.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (2)
-
E1 Three strategies to beat the not-so-good future: GMO Top1000funds.com
“Speaking in Sydney this week, Grantham pointed to GMO’s seven-year asset class return forecast, dated April 30, to show that the manager’s exposure to US high-quality stocks were expected to generate a 7.6 per cent return, emerging markets 8.4 per cent and timberland 7.5 per cent.”
-
E2 Three strategies you can lean on: Grantham - Investment Magazine Investment Magazine · 15 June 2010
“Speaking in Sydney yesterday, Grantham pointed to GMO's seven-year asset class return forecast, dated April 30, to show that the manager's exposure to US high quality stocks were expected to generate a 7.6 per cent return, emerging markets 8.4 per cent and timberland 7.5 per cent.”
Reasoning
E1 and E2 report that GMO's seven-year asset class forecast, dated April 30, 2010, put US high-quality stocks at 7.6%, emerging markets at 8.4% and timberland at 7.5%. Neither quote gives the forecast for the other equity classes, such as US large caps or international large caps. Neither gives a global equity portfolio figure or says the returns are real. That leaves no way to work out the implied global equity real return, or to check it against the 'just over 6%' range in the criteria.
Cite this claim
Jeremy Grantham, “GMO's seven-year forecast suggests a global equity portfolio can be built returning just over 6% a year plus inflation.” (said July 2010). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_76f1f208b9a0, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_76f1f208b9a0
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Jeremy Grantham
-
Resolved false
“we can conclude that the final low for this market might be well into 2024.”
The final low of this bear market might come well into 2024.
-
Mixed
“near certainty it was a year ago, is much more likely than not.”
A continued market decline of at least substantial proportions is much more likely than not.
-
Mostly false
“after a bloodbath is not unusual and may very well not outlive January.”
-
Mostly true
“may help to support the market for a few more months.”
The Presidential Cycle's positive influence may help support the market for a few more months.
-
Resolved true
“Each cycle is different and unique—but every historical parallel suggests that the worst is yet to come.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.