ClaimsJeremy Grantham

“My personal view of a major China stumble in the next three years or so is that it is maybe only a one in three chance, but is still the most likely important unpleasant surprise of the fundamental economic variety.”

Jeremy Grantham, GMO letter author October 2009 Jeremy Grantham GMO letter 3Q 2009: Just Desserts and Markets Being Silly Again (Scribd)

This quote could not be matched word for word to the source page.

Prediction Economics and markets

Grantham said his personal view was that a major China stumble in the next three years or so was maybe only a one in three chance, but was still the most likely important unpleasant surprise of the fundamental economic variety.

Mostly true True in substance, wrong in a detail.

Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?

The second judge would not resolve this claim; the verdict shown is the first judge's.

Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.

What would count as true or false

Judged at the end of 2012. A 'major China stumble' means a hard landing or crisis, such as annual real GDP growth falling below about 5%, a banking or financial crisis, or a sharp contraction widely described as a hard landing. Because Grantham put the chance at only about one in three, the forecast leaned against the event. True: no major China stumble occurred between October 2009 and the end of 2012. Mixed: a major stumble did occur (an outcome he rated as a minority but flagged as the most likely important unpleasant surprise). Mostly false: no major stumble occurred, but a different unpleasant economic surprise clearly dominated and contemporaneous assessments show a China stumble was never a leading risk. False: this verdict is not used for the probability component alone; reserve it for evidence that Grantham did not make this assessment.

Set before the research began.

Evidence (3)

  1. E1 How to interpret China's current slowdown - KPMG KPMG · September 2012

    “Growth for the first half of 2012 averaged 7.8 percent, which is the lowest growth rate in many years. A few days after the official data was released by the National Bureau of Statistics of China, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) lowered its estimate of China's GDP growth for 2012, from 8.2 percent to 8.0 percent, warning that a hard landing in the medium term is a possibility.”
  2. E2 How to interpret China's current slowdown - KPMG KPMG · September 2012

    “The immediate answer is that the prospect for a hard landing (or economic collapse) is slim.”
  3. E3 China's Economy: Slower Growth, But Structural Reforms Progressing Carnegie Endowment for International Peace · 17 May 2012

    “As China attempts to rebalance its economic model, it has avoided a hard landing and continues to move in the right direction on key structural reforms.”

Reasoning

KPMG (E1) reported China's first-half 2012 growth at 7.8 percent, described as the lowest in many years, which implies higher growth earlier in the window and nothing near the roughly 5% hard-landing threshold. KPMG judged the prospect of a hard landing slim (E2), and Carnegie (E3) said in May 2012 that China had avoided a hard landing. This points to no major China stumble during the forecast window, as the forecast leaned. The verdict stops short of fully true because the evidence does not cover the final months of 2012.

Cite this claim

Jeremy Grantham, “Grantham said his personal view was that a major China stumble in the next three years or so was maybe only a one in three chance, but was still the most likely important unpleasant surprise of the fundamental economic variety.” (said October 2009). Verdict: mostly true. Reliability API, claim c_6407436a81db, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_6407436a81db

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Jeremy Grantham, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

More prediction claims by Jeremy Grantham

  1. Resolved false Prediction January 2023
    “we can conclude that the final low for this market might be well into 2024.”

    The final low of this bear market might come well into 2024.

  2. Mixed Prediction January 2023
    “near certainty it was a year ago, is much more likely than not.”

    A continued market decline of at least substantial proportions is much more likely than not.

  3. Mostly false Prediction January 2023
    “after a bloodbath is not unusual and may very well not outlive January.”

    The January 2023 rally may well not outlive January.

  4. Mostly true Prediction January 2023
    “may help to support the market for a few more months.”

    The Presidential Cycle's positive influence may help support the market for a few more months.

  5. Resolved true Prediction 31 August 2022
    “Each cycle is different and unique—but every historical parallel suggests that the worst is yet to come.”

    Grantham says historical parallels suggest the worst of the current market downturn is still to come.

All of them

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.