Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
72 63 80 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
56 46 67 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 0 promises resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 65 (likely 59 to 72, high confidence), from 73 claims: 42 factual claims, 31 predictions. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Jeremy Grantham's claims
29 claims
“I have been spending twice my usual total research time on all these new interactions, which for anyone interested in data analysis have presented an amazing challenge.”
Jeremy Grantham, GMO co-founder 2020 1Q 2020 GMO Quarterly Letter (GMO)
Grantham has been spending twice his usual total research time on the interactions between the virus, the economy and markets.
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Reasoning
Grantham's own time spent, an internal count.
Cite this claim
Jeremy Grantham, “Grantham has been spending twice his usual total research time on the interactions between the virus, the economy and markets.” (said 2020). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_e9b3fe272285, method 0.1.0+28da144b. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_e9b3fe272285
Claims without a verdict
- Unresolvable 148
- Not yet due 17
- Own records only 29
- Not researched 194
- Not checkable 543
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Jeremy Grantham? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.