There will be many interesting demonstrations, but ten years is too short a period for a clear winner to emerge.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
deadline 2036 is after 2026-11-04
Cite this claim
Rodney Brooks, “There will be many interesting demonstrations, but ten years is too short a period for a clear winner to emerge.” (said 1 January 2026). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_5aa7cb053d86, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_5aa7cb053d86
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Rodney Brooks
-
Resolved true
“There will be many claims on this title earlier than 2023, but none of them will pan out.”
Claims before 2023 to be the next big thing in AI beyond deep learning will not pan out.
-
Mostly false
“Things at this stage are looking good for Artemis to fly in February 2026.”
The Artemis II crewed lunar flyby looks on track to fly in February 2026.
-
Resolved true
“Launch seems imminent.”
Rodney Brooks wrote on 2025-01-01 that New Glenn's launch seemed imminent.
-
Resolved false
“Thereafter it is expected to fly with a crew once a year.”
-
Mostly true
“I am concerned that Starship will not be ready for the proposed 2025 Lunar Landing of astronauts and that will really delay humankind’s return the to Moon.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.