Claims before 2023 to be the next big thing in AI beyond deep learning will not pan out.
Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
The second judge would not resolve this claim; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
What would count as true or false
'Next big thing beyond deep learning' means an AI approach claimed, before 2023, to succeed or displace deep learning. Advances that are themselves deep learning (e.g. transformers, large language models, diffusion models) do not count as such a successor. True: as of 2023, no approach publicly claimed before 2023 to be the successor to deep learning had become widely recognised in the field as having displaced or superseded it. Mostly true: one such approach had gained notable but limited traction without being generally recognised as superseding deep learning. False: by 2023 a non-deep-learning paradigm claimed as the successor had become widely recognised as the dominant new AI approach.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (4)
-
E1 Predictions Scorecard, 2023 January 01 Rodney Brooks (rodneybrooks.com) · 1 January 2023 Own record
“Whether neuro-symbolic becomes a real dominant approach is still up in the air. But it has a whiff of possibility about it.”
-
E2 Predictions Scorecard, 2023 January 01 Rodney Brooks (rodneybrooks.com) · 1 January 2023 Own record
“There are two or three candidates bubbling up, but all coming out of the now tradition of deep learning.”
-
E3 Predictions Scorecard, 2024 January 01 Rodney Brooks (rodneybrooks.com) · 1 January 2024 Own record
“A year ago I thought it would perhaps be neuro-symbolic AI, but clearly it is LLMs, and ChatGPT and its cousins.”
-
E4 Why neurosymbolic AI could be the next big thing | Fortune Fortune · 9 December 2024
“There are many flavors of neurosymbolic AI, but those being deployed today mostly involve having the neural and symbolic components work alongside each other and interact when they need to, rather than being tightly integrated into a new kind of model—a more theoretical vision for now.”
Reasoning
An independent Fortune article from December 2024 (E4) still calls neurosymbolic AI something that "could be the next big thing". It says the versions in use then mostly run neural and symbolic parts side by side, and that a tightly integrated new kind of model was still "a more theoretical vision". That indicates no non-deep-learning successor had displaced deep learning by the end of 2023. Brooks's own scorecards point the same way: in early 2023 the emerging candidates came out of deep learning and neuro-symbolic was "still up in the air" (E1, E2), and in 2024 he named LLMs as the big thing (E3). The criteria count LLMs as deep learning, not as a successor to it. The evidence does not show any claimed successor gaining notable traction by 2023, so the claim resolves true rather than mostly true.
Cite this claim
Rodney Brooks, “Claims before 2023 to be the next big thing in AI beyond deep learning will not pan out.” (said 1 January 2018). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_83c6c54c3251, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_83c6c54c3251
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Rodney Brooks
-
Mostly false
“Things at this stage are looking good for Artemis to fly in February 2026.”
The Artemis II crewed lunar flyby looks on track to fly in February 2026.
-
Resolved true
“Launch seems imminent.”
Rodney Brooks wrote on 2025-01-01 that New Glenn's launch seemed imminent.
-
Resolved false
“Thereafter it is expected to fly with a crew once a year.”
-
Mostly true
“I am concerned that Starship will not be ready for the proposed 2025 Lunar Landing of astronauts and that will really delay humankind’s return the to Moon.”
-
Resolved true
“If electric sales continue to grow at 68% per year then 2025 would hit 28% of new cars in the US being electric.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.