Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
80 72 88 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
70 62 78 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 2 promises resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 75 (likely 69 to 80, high confidence), from 79 claims: 35 factual claims, 44 predictions. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Scott Alexander's claims
2 claims
| Verdict | Kind | Said | Claim | Topic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mostly false | Prediction | 15 Feb 2018 | First World economies will increasingly be marked by an Officialness Divide between formal institutions for the rich and informal gig economies for the poor. Prediction · 15 Feb 2018 | Economics and markets |
| Mostly false | Prediction | 6 Jan 2017 | Scott Alexander gave a 70% chance that Keith Ellison would be chosen as the new DNC chair. Prediction · 6 Jan 2017 | Other |
“First World economies will increasingly be marked by an Officialness Divide.”
Scott Alexander, blog author 15 February 2018 Five More Years (Slate Star Codex)
First World economies will increasingly be marked by an Officialness Divide between formal institutions for the rich and informal gig economies for the poor.
Mostly false False in substance, right in a detail.
The second judge would not resolve this claim; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
What would count as true or false
Judge by 2023. The test is whether, between 2018 and 2023, high-income ('First World') economies became increasingly marked by a divide in which richer people mainly used formal, official institutions (salaried employment, credentialed and regulated services) while poorer people increasingly relied on informal or gig arrangements. TRUE: data or research covering several high-income economies show that gig, informal or unofficial work and services grew over 2018–2023, with the growth concentrated among lower-income people, so the income divide widened. MOSTLY TRUE: the pattern holds in most of the economies examined, or holds clearly but with a modest scale. MIXED: gig or informal work grew but was not clearly stratified by income, or the pattern appears in only some major economies. MOSTLY FALSE: only small or anecdotal signs of such a divide, while the broad data show stable shares. FALSE: the data show gig and informal work shares flat or declining among lower-income people, or no widening of an income-based divide.
Evidence
- America’s gig economy workforce holds steady around 10% of total The Edge Malaysia (reporting on a BLS report) · 9 November 2024
“About one-tenth of the US labour force is working in the gig economy, a share that’s held steady from the pre-pandemic years, a new government study found.”
- Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements News Release U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · 8 November 2024
“In May 2017, the last time the survey was conducted, 3.8 percent of workers held contingent jobs.”
- digital platform workers Statistics Explained Eurostat · 21 September 2025
“Digital platform workers were more likely to be male than female (3.2 % of all males aged 15-64 compared with 2.8 % of all females).”
- digital platform workers Statistics Explained Eurostat · 21 September 2025
“In 2022, 3.0 % of people reported digital platform employment in the last 12 months”
Reasoning
E1 reports a new US government study finding that about one-tenth of the US labour force works in the gig economy, a share that has held steady since the pre-pandemic years. That points to stable shares, not a growing gig sector, in the US. E2 gives only the 2017 baseline for contingent work. E3 and E4 give a single 2022 snapshot of EU platform work (3.0%) with a breakdown by sex but not by income, so they show neither growth nor an income divide. The available data point to stable shares and do not show a widening income-based divide, but they cover few economies and have no income breakdown, so the claim resolves mostly false rather than false.
Cite this claim
Scott Alexander, “First World economies will increasingly be marked by an Officialness Divide between formal institutions for the rich and informal gig economies for the poor.” (said 15 February 2018). Verdict: mostly false. Reliability API, claim c_410cd4128c46, method 0.1.0+8bea457b. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_410cd4128c46
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Scott Alexander? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.