Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
80 72 88 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
70 62 78 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 2 promises resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 75 (likely 69 to 80, high confidence), from 79 claims: 35 factual claims, 44 predictions. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Scott Alexander's claims
19 claims
“So 2025, slightly better coding, 2026, slightly better agents, slightly better coding.”
Scott Alexander, podcast guest 3 April 2025 AI 2027: month-by-month model of intelligence explosion — Scott Alexander & Daniel Kokotajlo (Dwarkesh Podcast)
AI will show slightly better coding in 2025, then slightly better agents and coding in 2026.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Reasoning
deadline 2026 is after 2026-11-04
Cite this claim
Scott Alexander, “AI will show slightly better coding in 2025, then slightly better agents and coding in 2026.” (said 3 April 2025). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_700bfddfe62c, method 0.1.0+8bea457b. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_700bfddfe62c
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Scott Alexander? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.