ClaimsPeople

Nate Silver

Nate Silver is an election forecaster and writer who founded FiveThirtyEight and now publishes the Silver Bulletin newsletter.

617 claims collected, 163 researched, 84 resolved. Report of 10 November 2026, method 0.1.0+28da144b.

Scores by kind of claim

Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.

  • Factual claims

    Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?

    82 76 88

    High confidence, 63 factual claims resolved. From 19 documents, 2012 to 2026; 19 documents sampled from 35 candidates found.

    Not scored: 42 unresolvable, 7 checkable only against their own records.

    See the factual claims

  • Predictions

    Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?

    61 47 75

    Medium confidence, 16 predictions resolved. From 8 documents, 2015 to 2025; 19 documents sampled from 35 candidates found.

    Not scored: 12 unresolvable. 10 more fall due later.

    Does not yet allow for how likely each prediction was when made.

    See the predictions

  • Promises

    Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?

    67 46 85

    Low confidence, 5 promises resolved. From 4 documents, 2022 to 2025; 19 documents sampled from 35 candidates found.

    Not scored: 7 unresolvable.

    See the promises

All types combined: 77 (likely 72 to 82, high confidence), from 84 claims: 63 factual claims, 16 predictions, 5 promises. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.

Nate Silver's claims

10 claims

10 claims, sorted by newest said. Choose a claim to read it in full.
VerdictKindSaidClaimTopic
Not yet due Prediction 28 Oct 2026 Silver said that, "with AI looming too," "it could be the biggest issue of 2028," and argued that AI could become one of the defining issues of the next US presidential election. Prediction · 28 Oct 2026 AI timelines and forecasting
Not yet due Prediction 23 Oct 2026 The 2026 elections will almost certainly include states with Senate and gubernatorial results splitting by party, similar to Vermont and Kansas in 2022. Prediction · 23 Oct 2026 AI policy and governance
Not yet due Prediction 23 Oct 2026 FLIPR projects the median margin gap between statewide contests in 2026 will be about six points. Prediction · 23 Oct 2026 AI policy and governance
Not yet due Prediction 12 May 2025 Nate Silver suspects that the prediction markets are more in the right ballpark on the 2026 midterms than Yglesias and Cook. Prediction · 12 May 2025 Other
Not yet due Prediction 12 May 2025 If Democrats win three of the four named Senate races plus the presidency, they would probably have a trifecta in 2028. Prediction · 12 May 2025 Other
Not yet due Prediction 8 Apr 2025 Congress would ultimately need two-thirds majorities to stop the tariffs because Trump has threatened a veto, and Silver said he believed Trump would follow through on those threats. Prediction · 8 Apr 2025 AI policy and governance
Not yet due Prediction 8 Apr 2025 Silver said he did not think getting 60 votes in the Senate on measures against Trump's tariffs, enough to overcome a filibuster, would be so hard. Prediction · 8 Apr 2025 AI policy and governance
Not yet due Prediction 8 Apr 2025 In April 2025, Silver said that at that point he would consider Democrats a little over 50% likely to retake the White House in 2028. Prediction · 8 Apr 2025 AI policy and governance
Not yet due Prediction 8 Apr 2025 Trump's tariffs could be rescinded at any time, if not now then after the 2026 midterms or after the 2028 election. Prediction · 8 Apr 2025 Economics and markets
Not yet due Prediction 7 Nov 2024 Utah could become a swing state by 2040. Prediction · 7 Nov 2024 Other
Back to the list

Nate Silver

Open its page

Prediction AI policy and governance Political

“They will ultimately need two thirds majorities because Trump has threatened and I think I believe would detail these threats.”

Nate Silver, podcast co-host 8 April 2025 Tariffs, Tariffs, Tariffs (Risky Business) (iHeart)

Congress would ultimately need two-thirds majorities to stop the tariffs because Trump has threatened a veto, and Silver said he believed Trump would follow through on those threats.

Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.

What would count as true or false

Judge by the end of the 119th Congress (3 January 2027). True: Trump threatened to veto legislation or resolutions blocking his tariffs (e.g. Statements of Administration Policy), and any such measure that passed both chambers was vetoed, so that enacting it required or would have required two-thirds override majorities. Mostly true: veto threats were made and no blocking measure became law without an override, but no measure reached Trump's desk, so the veto was never actually tested. Mixed: veto threats were made but Trump signed some tariff-limiting legislation while vetoing or threatening others. Mostly false: Trump made no clear veto threat but blocking measures still failed. False: Trump signed tariff-blocking legislation passed by simple majorities.

Evidence

  1. STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY - The White House Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget · 28 April 2025
    “If S.J. Res. 49 were presented to the President, he would veto it.”
  2. House defies Trump on tariffs | Grant Thornton Grant Thornton · 17 February 2026
    “However, President Trump has said he would veto any attempt to overturn his tariffs, and even if the Senate passes the resolution, Congress appears unlikely to muster the two-thirds supermajority needed to override a veto.”
  3. The U.S. House just voted to stop Trump's 'emergency' tariffs on imports from Canada Reason · 11 February 2026
    “Even if the House-passed resolution makes it to his desk, he could veto it. Actually blocking the tariffs would require a veto-proof two-thirds majority in both chambers of Congress.”
  4. What Happens to Tariffs Now That Democrats Control Congress DaveManuel.com · 6 November 2026
    “In 2025 the Senate passed four resolutions to end the tariff emergencies, on Canada twice, on Brazil and on the global tariffs (a fifth, on the global tariffs in April, failed 49-49), and none of them became law.”

Reasoning

E1 shows a formal White House veto threat against S.J. Res. 49, and E2 reports Trump said he would veto any attempt to overturn his tariffs. E4 says the Senate passed several 2025 resolutions and the House passed a Canada resolution (E3), but none became law and no veto is shown. The 119th Congress runs until 3 January 2027, so a measure could still reach Trump's desk and be vetoed or signed. That would change which verdict tier applies, so the outcome is not yet settled.

Cite this claim

Nate Silver, “Congress would ultimately need two-thirds majorities to stop the tariffs because Trump has threatened a veto, and Silver said he believed Trump would follow through on those threats.” (said 8 April 2025). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_6a674dbb7bee, method 0.1.0+28da144b. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_6a674dbb7bee

Claims without a verdict

Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Nate Silver? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.