Congress would ultimately need two-thirds majorities to stop the tariffs because Trump has threatened a veto, and Silver said he believed Trump would follow through on those threats.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
What would count as true or false
Judge by the end of the 119th Congress (3 January 2027). True: Trump threatened to veto legislation or resolutions blocking his tariffs (e.g. Statements of Administration Policy), and any such measure that passed both chambers was vetoed, so that enacting it required or would have required two-thirds override majorities. Mostly true: veto threats were made and no blocking measure became law without an override, but no measure reached Trump's desk, so the veto was never actually tested. Mixed: veto threats were made but Trump signed some tariff-limiting legislation while vetoing or threatening others. Mostly false: Trump made no clear veto threat but blocking measures still failed. False: Trump signed tariff-blocking legislation passed by simple majorities.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (4)
-
E1 STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY - The White House Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget · 28 April 2025
“If S.J. Res. 49 were presented to the President, he would veto it.”
-
E2 House defies Trump on tariffs | Grant Thornton Grant Thornton · 17 February 2026
“However, President Trump has said he would veto any attempt to overturn his tariffs, and even if the Senate passes the resolution, Congress appears unlikely to muster the two-thirds supermajority needed to override a veto.”
-
E3 The U.S. House just voted to stop Trump's 'emergency' tariffs on imports from Canada Reason · 11 February 2026
“Even if the House-passed resolution makes it to his desk, he could veto it. Actually blocking the tariffs would require a veto-proof two-thirds majority in both chambers of Congress.”
-
E4 What Happens to Tariffs Now That Democrats Control Congress DaveManuel.com · 6 November 2026
“In 2025 the Senate passed four resolutions to end the tariff emergencies, on Canada twice, on Brazil and on the global tariffs (a fifth, on the global tariffs in April, failed 49-49), and none of them became law.”
Reasoning
E1 shows a formal White House veto threat against S.J. Res. 49, and E2 reports Trump said he would veto any attempt to overturn his tariffs. E4 says the Senate passed several 2025 resolutions and the House passed a Canada resolution (E3), but none became law and no veto is shown. The 119th Congress runs until 3 January 2027, so a measure could still reach Trump's desk and be vetoed or signed. That would change which verdict tier applies, so the outcome is not yet settled.
Cite this claim
Nate Silver, “Congress would ultimately need two-thirds majorities to stop the tariffs because Trump has threatened a veto, and Silver said he believed Trump would follow through on those threats.” (said 8 April 2025). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_6a674dbb7bee, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_6a674dbb7bee
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Nate Silver
-
Resolved true
“If the GOP takes over the House next year one thing you can be pretty sure of is COVID panels/investigations.”
-
Mixed
“Children's toys are gonna become much more expensive because they're made in countries like Vietnam in Southeast Asia that are heavily taraffed.”
-
Mostly true
“I think people might understand with Kamala Harris that it's inherently a difficult circumstance and a little bit of a long shot bid, but that her chances are probably better than Biden.”
-
Mixed
“Most voters aren’t paying attention yet, and it will be nine months to a year before they do.”
-
Mostly false
“I’d argue that 1 (Biden winning) is more likely than 2 (Trump winning) which, in turn, is more likely than 3 (someone else winning).”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.