Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
82 76 88 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
61 47 75 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
67 46 85
All types combined: 77 (likely 72 to 82, high confidence), from 84 claims: 63 factual claims, 16 predictions, 5 promises. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Nate Silver's claims
1 claim
| Verdict | Kind | Said | Claim | Topic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research failed | Factual | 27 May 2022 | Forgiving some student loan debt is reasonably popular. Factual · 27 May 2022 | Economics and markets |
“Forgiving some student loan debt is reasonably popular.”
Nate Silver, writing on X 27 May 2022 Post by @NateSilver538 on X, 2022-05-27 (X)
Forgiving some student loan debt is reasonably popular.
Research failed Research could not run for this claim; not scored.
Reasoning
No resolution criteria were returned for this claim, so it could not be researched.
Cite this claim
Nate Silver, “Forgiving some student loan debt is reasonably popular.” (said 27 May 2022). Verdict: research failed. Reliability API, claim c_6b093e5f348b, method 0.1.0+28da144b. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_6b093e5f348b
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Nate Silver? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.