Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
82 76 88 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
61 47 75 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
67 46 85
All types combined: 77 (likely 72 to 82, high confidence), from 84 claims: 63 factual claims, 16 predictions, 5 promises. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Nate Silver's claims
10 claims
“And while I have no idea what it will say,5 I suspect that the prediction markets are more in the right ballpark than Yglesias and Cook.”
Nate Silver, author 12 May 2025 Can Democrats really win the Senate in 2026? (Silver Bulletin)
Nate Silver suspects that the prediction markets are more in the right ballpark on the 2026 midterms than Yglesias and Cook.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Reasoning
deadline 2026 is after 2026-11-04
Cite this claim
Nate Silver, “Nate Silver suspects that the prediction markets are more in the right ballpark on the 2026 midterms than Yglesias and Cook.” (said 12 May 2025). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_35d80f2041da, method 0.1.0+28da144b. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_35d80f2041da
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Nate Silver? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.