Nate Silver suspects that the prediction markets are more in the right ballpark on the 2026 midterms than Yglesias and Cook.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Reasoning
deadline 2026 is after 2026-11-04
Cite this claim
Nate Silver, “Nate Silver suspects that the prediction markets are more in the right ballpark on the 2026 midterms than Yglesias and Cook.” (said 12 May 2025). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_35d80f2041da, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_35d80f2041da
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Nate Silver
-
Mostly false
“I’d argue that 1 (Biden winning) is more likely than 2 (Trump winning) which, in turn, is more likely than 3 (someone else winning).”
-
Mostly false
“If Trump does well in Iowa and New Hampshire — and there’s no snafu for Biden — they could become their party’s presumptive nominees as soon as February”
-
Resolved false
“Our emphatic prediction is simply that Trump will not win the nomination.”
Donald Trump will not win the 2016 Republican presidential nomination.
-
Resolved false
“Nor, in all likelihood, could Trump win with a plurality of votes or delegates because the Republican Party, which controls the nomination process, would unite against him.”
-
Mixed
“Children's toys are gonna become much more expensive because they're made in countries like Vietnam in Southeast Asia that are heavily taraffed.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.