Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
73 67 79 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Insufficient record: 0 predictions resolved, 5 needed for a score.
-
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 0 promises resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 73 (likely 67 to 79, high confidence), from 94 claims: 94 factual claims. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Nassim Taleb's claims
2 claims
| Verdict | Kind | Said | Claim | Topic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not yet due | Prediction | 29 Dec 2019 | The probability that any of the books shown in the linked post, except perhaps Dalrymple's and Murakami's, will survive a decade is very small. Prediction · 29 Dec 2019 | Other |
| Not yet due | Prediction | 10 Jul 2017 | A book that is interesting today and would have been interesting 20 years ago will probably still be interesting 20 years from now. Prediction · 10 Jul 2017 | Their own work or organisation |
“The probability of any of these books surviving a decade (except perhaps Darlymple & Murakami) so tiny.”
Nassim Taleb, posting on X 29 December 2019 Post by @nntaleb on X, 2019-12-29 (X)
The probability that any of the books shown in the linked post, except perhaps Dalrymple's and Murakami's, will survive a decade is very small.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Reasoning
deadline 2029 is after 2026-11-04
Cite this claim
Nassim Taleb, “The probability that any of the books shown in the linked post, except perhaps Dalrymple's and Murakami's, will survive a decade is very small.” (said 29 December 2019). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_4e980f4c3067, method 0.1.0+28da144b. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_4e980f4c3067
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Nassim Taleb? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.