Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
73 67 79 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Insufficient record: 0 predictions resolved, 5 needed for a score.
-
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 0 promises resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 73 (likely 67 to 79, high confidence), from 94 claims: 94 factual claims. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Nassim Taleb's claims
10 claims
“The Lindy Chapter is done (for technical stuff).”
Nassim Taleb, author, on X 27 December 2020 Post by @nntaleb on X, 2020-12-27 (X)
Taleb has finished the technical content of the Lindy chapter of his book.
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Reasoning
Author's internal progress on a book chapter.
Cite this claim
Nassim Taleb, “Taleb has finished the technical content of the Lindy chapter of his book.” (said 27 December 2020). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_0b47c749924f, method 0.1.0+28da144b. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_0b47c749924f
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Nassim Taleb? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.