Scott Alexander made many correlated cryptocurrency predictions for 2018, which therefore scored badly.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
What would count as true or false
Judged as of 2019-01-22. True: Scott's 2018 prediction list included several cryptocurrency predictions that depended on the same underlying trend (for example, prices staying high), and most of them resolved wrong in his scoring post. Mostly true: there were several such predictions, but they did somewhat better than 'badly' implies, or 'many' means only a few. Mixed: about half of the crypto predictions failed. Mostly false: there were few crypto predictions, or most of them came true. False: there were no crypto predictions, or all of them came true.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (4)
-
E1 Predictions For 2018 Slate Star Codex (Scott Alexander) · 6 February 2018 Own record
“17. Bitcoin is higher than $5,000 at end of year: 95%”
-
E2 Predictions For 2018 Slate Star Codex (Scott Alexander) · 6 February 2018 Own record
“18. Bitcoin is higher than $10,000 at end of year: 80%”
-
E3 Predictions For 2018 Slate Star Codex (Scott Alexander) · 6 February 2018 Own record
“Bitcoin prices are already too high (they were higher when I wrote these predictions a few days ago).”
-
E4 2018 Crypto Year in Review | CoinCodex CoinCodex · 3 January 2019
“BTC would eventually reach as low as $3,200 on December 15.”
Reasoning
Scott Alexander's 2018 list includes at least two linked Bitcoin predictions: 95% that Bitcoin ends the year above $5,000 (E1) and 80% that it ends above $10,000 (E2). An independent source reports Bitcoin fell as low as $3,200 on December 15, 2018 (E4). That source does not give the year-end price, and the scoring post is not in the evidence. The evidence therefore does not settle whether most crypto predictions resolved wrong, or whether there were 'many' of them.
Cite this claim
Scott Alexander, “Scott Alexander made many correlated cryptocurrency predictions for 2018, which therefore scored badly.” (said 22 January 2019). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_dd27ea9d38fa, method 0.1.0+8bea457b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_dd27ea9d38fa
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Scott Alexander
-
Mostly true
“Reader Nikita Sokolsky has completed his work getting some extra Fatima documents from Portugal and translating them into English.”
-
Resolved true
“Rob Ennals, who made this year’s book review contest site, has gathered the reviews from earlier years into epubs here.”
-
Resolved true
“There’s a good interview with Skarbek in last month’s issue of Asterisk, I think it will be online shortly.”
-
Resolved true
“Things felt so fuzzy that I (partly) abandoned my usual clear-resolution probabilistic predictions for total guesses.”
-
Resolved true
“Also last month, I suggested Manifold Markets have a loan feature to help boost investment in long-term markets.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.