Physical robots in current designs are not ripe for exponential cost reduction by burning wastes, and that will not happen just because humanoid robots are (perhaps) mass produced.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
Open-ended prediction with no horizon and vague terms ('current designs').
Cite this claim
Rodney Brooks, “Physical robots in current designs are not ripe for exponential cost reduction by burning wastes, and that will not happen just because humanoid robots are (perhaps) mass produced.” (said 1 January 2025). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_c6512e426ce3, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_c6512e426ce3
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Rodney Brooks
-
Resolved true
“Launch seems imminent.”
Rodney Brooks wrote on 2025-01-01 that New Glenn's launch seemed imminent.
-
Resolved true
“If electric sales continue to grow at 68% per year then 2025 would hit 28% of new cars in the US being electric.”
-
Mostly false
“Things at this stage are looking good for Artemis to fly in February 2026.”
The Artemis II crewed lunar flyby looks on track to fly in February 2026.
-
Resolved false
“Thereafter it is expected to fly with a crew once a year.”
-
Mostly true
“I am concerned that Starship will not be ready for the proposed 2025 Lunar Landing of astronauts and that will really delay humankind’s return the to Moon.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.