In a Reddit thread of 10,401 comments asking for people against gay marriage, the author found only two commenters who opposed it, near the bottom.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
What would count as true or false
Judge as of 2014-09-30. The claim is that in the Reddit thread of about 10,401 comments asking for people against gay marriage, the author found only two commenters who opposed it, near the bottom. True: an archived copy of the thread shows roughly that many comments, and only about two top-level or substantive comments actually opposing gay marriage, placed low in the sort order. Mostly true: the thread and the near-absence of opponents are confirmed, but the exact count (e.g. three or four rather than two) or the comment total is slightly off. Mixed: the thread exists, but opponents were noticeably more common than claimed, though still a small minority, or they were not near the bottom. Mostly false: the thread exists but has a fair number of visible opposing comments, so 'only two, way near the bottom' badly understates them. False: no such thread exists, or opposing comments were common and prominent.
Set before the research began.
Reasoning
No evidence with a verified quote was found apart from the claim's own source, so the claim was not judged.
Cite this claim
Scott Alexander, “In a Reddit thread of 10,401 comments asking for people against gay marriage, the author found only two commenters who opposed it, near the bottom.” (said 30 September 2014). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_a03ea7046325, method 0.1.0+8bea457b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_a03ea7046325
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Scott Alexander
-
Mostly true
“There’s this thing where through history, people have been really reluctant to admit an AI is truly intelligent.”
Through history, people have been reluctant to admit an AI is truly intelligent.
-
Mostly true
“Since most of the benefits of prison come from incapacitation rather than deterrence, we should expect this to have limited effect”
Most of the benefits of prison come from incapacitation rather than deterrence.
-
Resolved true
“I do think solitary might be more expensive”
Solitary confinement for prisoners might be more expensive than standard imprisonment.
-
Resolved true
“I (following Roodman) gave two conclusions in my cost-benefit analysis - one that counted the suffering by prisoners themselves, and one that didn’t.”
-
Mostly true
“I started this essay by pointing out that, despite what geographical and cultural distance would suggest, the Nazis’ outgroup was not the vastly different Japanese, but the almost-identical German…”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.