Scott Alexander's new survey asks respondents to assign utility weights to about 80 different AI safety accomplishments.
Not researched Checkable, but outside the sample that was researched.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Cite this claim
Scott Alexander, “Scott Alexander's new survey asks respondents to assign utility weights to about 80 different AI safety accomplishments.” (said 19 October 2026). Verdict: not researched. Reliability API, claim c_86b8d5d8e17e, method 0.1.0+8bea457b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_86b8d5d8e17e
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Scott Alexander
-
Mostly true
“Reader Nikita Sokolsky has completed his work getting some extra Fatima documents from Portugal and translating them into English.”
-
Resolved true
“Rob Ennals, who made this year’s book review contest site, has gathered the reviews from earlier years into epubs here.”
-
Resolved true
“There’s a good interview with Skarbek in last month’s issue of Asterisk, I think it will be online shortly.”
-
Resolved true
“Things felt so fuzzy that I (partly) abandoned my usual clear-resolution probabilistic predictions for total guesses.”
-
Resolved true
“Also last month, I suggested Manifold Markets have a loan feature to help boost investment in long-term markets.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.