Scott Alexander was warned by people "in the know" that the NYT would publish something as negative as possible about him once it had an excuse.
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
Private warnings from unnamed people can only be confirmed by him.
Cite this claim
Scott Alexander, “Scott Alexander was warned by people "in the know" that the NYT would publish something as negative as possible about him once it had an excuse.” (said 14 February 2021). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_78d5ced3f030, method 0.1.0+8bea457b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_78d5ced3f030
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Scott Alexander
-
Mostly true
“Reader Nikita Sokolsky has completed his work getting some extra Fatima documents from Portugal and translating them into English.”
-
Resolved true
“Rob Ennals, who made this year’s book review contest site, has gathered the reviews from earlier years into epubs here.”
-
Resolved true
“There’s a good interview with Skarbek in last month’s issue of Asterisk, I think it will be online shortly.”
-
Resolved true
“Things felt so fuzzy that I (partly) abandoned my usual clear-resolution probabilistic predictions for total guesses.”
-
Resolved true
“Also last month, I suggested Manifold Markets have a loan feature to help boost investment in long-term markets.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.