Of his 2018 predictions at 95%, Scott Alexander got 6 right and 2 wrong, a score of 75%.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
What would count as true or false
Judged against Scott Alexander's January 2019 post grading his 2018 predictions, counting the predictions he made at 95% confidence and how each resolved. True: there were 8 such predictions, 6 right and 2 wrong (75%). Mostly true: the score is about 75% but one count is off by one, for example from a disputed grading. False: the counts are clearly different, for example 7 right and 1 wrong. Any correction he published to the grading governs.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (3)
-
E1 Predictions For 2018 Slate Star Codex · 6 February 2018 Own record
“1. Donald Trump remains president at end of year: 95%”
-
E2 Predictions For 2018 Slate Star Codex · 6 February 2018 Own record
“17. Bitcoin is higher than $5,000 at end of year: 95%”
-
E3 Predictions For 2018 Slate Star Codex · 6 February 2018 Own record
“98. [Secret prediction]: 95%”
Reasoning
E1–E3 come from the February 2018 post where the predictions were made. They show three of the predictions set at 95% (Trump remains president, Bitcoin above $5,000, and a secret prediction). None of the evidence is from the January 2019 grading post, and none says how many 95% predictions there were or how each one resolved. So the 6 right, 2 wrong (75%) tally cannot be checked against the resolution criteria.
Cite this claim
Scott Alexander, “Of his 2018 predictions at 95%, Scott Alexander got 6 right and 2 wrong, a score of 75%.” (said 22 January 2019). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_6ce9a881f67d, method 0.1.0+8bea457b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_6ce9a881f67d
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Scott Alexander
-
Mostly true
“Reader Nikita Sokolsky has completed his work getting some extra Fatima documents from Portugal and translating them into English.”
-
Resolved true
“Rob Ennals, who made this year’s book review contest site, has gathered the reviews from earlier years into epubs here.”
-
Resolved true
“There’s a good interview with Skarbek in last month’s issue of Asterisk, I think it will be online shortly.”
-
Resolved true
“Things felt so fuzzy that I (partly) abandoned my usual clear-resolution probabilistic predictions for total guesses.”
-
Resolved true
“Also last month, I suggested Manifold Markets have a loan feature to help boost investment in long-term markets.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.