Nate Silver turned on paid subscriptions for the Silver Bulletin newsletter by 11 September 2023.
Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
The evidence is the person's or their organisation's own records.
What would count as true or false
True: the Silver Bulletin on Substack offered paid subscriptions on or before 2023-09-11, shown by an archived subscribe page with paid tiers, a dated post announcing paid subscriptions, or paywalled posts dated on or before that day. Mostly true: paid subscriptions launched within a day or two of the date, with the announcement on 11 September itself. False: evidence shows paid subscriptions became available only after 2023-09-11, e.g. archived pages from that date showing a free-only option.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (3)
-
E1 Nate Silver (@natesilver) Substack · 11 September 2023 Own record
“All right, took the plunge and turned on paid subscriptions! Most posts will be free so keeping expectations modest, but there will be subscriber-only Q&As and other occasional nerdy stuff.”
-
E2 Comments - Soft launch of paid subscriptions Silver Bulletin (natesilver.net) · 11 September 2023 Own record
“Nate Silver<br>Sep 11, 2023<br>90<br>19<br>10”
-
E3 About - Silver Bulletin Silver Bulletin Own record
“Silver Bulletin launched paid subscriptions in September 2023.”
Reasoning
E2 is a Silver Bulletin post titled 'Soft launch of paid subscriptions' and dated Sep 11, 2023. The criteria name a dated post announcing paid subscriptions as one way to show the claim is true. E1, a Substack note from the same day, says paid subscriptions had been turned on. E3, the About page, says paid subscriptions launched in September 2023. All three sources are the subject's own records, and no independent source confirms them.
Cite this claim
Nate Silver, “Nate Silver turned on paid subscriptions for the Silver Bulletin newsletter by 11 September 2023.” (said 11 September 2023). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_618bdb73a623, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_618bdb73a623
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Nate Silver
-
Resolved true
“a Trump sweep of the swing states was actually our most common scenario, occurring in 20 percent of simulations.”
-
Resolved true
“Part of why I've moved the model back to the newsletter, where the probabilities are paywalled, technically”
-
Mostly true
“launching FiveThirtyEight was basically my fourth career after management consulting, professional poker, and baseball analytics.”
-
Mostly true
“Overall we were quite happy and the forecasts were largely accurate and well-calibrated despite a bad year for the polls.”
-
Resolved true
“Too soon for a "this held up well" but looks better after Sanders polled at just 11% in the highest-quality poll of Iowa this weekend.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.