ClaimsBill Ackman

“are not likely to step back in”

Bill Ackman, speaking at Ira Sohn conference 5 May 2014 Bill Ackman Presentation At Ira Sohn 2014 Investment Conference (Hedge Fund Alpha)

Prediction Economics and markets

Banks are not likely to step back in and provide meaningful mortgage investment.

Mostly true True in substance, wrong in a detail.

Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?

The second judge said resolved true; the verdict shown is the first judge's.

What would count as true or false

This prediction has no deadline, so judge it over a five-year horizon from May 2014 to May 2019. 'Step back in' means banks returning as large net buyers or holders of residential mortgage credit, enough to take a materially larger share of the mortgage market than in 2013–14 and to reduce reliance on the GSEs or government. True: over 2014–2019, banks' share of US residential mortgage debt outstanding, counting whole loans plus non-agency mortgage securities held by depository institutions, stayed flat or fell, and the GSEs/Ginnie Mae remained the dominant source of mortgage funding. Mostly true: bank holdings grew in dollars but the banks' share rose by no more than about 2 percentage points, with no reversal in the dominant role of government-backed funding. Mixed: banks' share rose by roughly 2–5 points, or the measures conflict (for example portfolio lending grew strongly while the overall share stayed flat). Mostly false: banks' share rose by more than 5 points, or banks clearly became a major new source of mortgage investment in one large segment (such as jumbo or portfolio loans) that commentators widely described as banks returning. False: banks clearly re-entered as a meaningful mortgage investor, with a sustained rise in share large enough to displace government-backed funding to a material degree.

Set before the research began.

Evidence (4)

  1. E1 Trends in Mortgage Origination and Servicing FDIC Quarterly (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) · 2019

    “The share of mortgages outstanding held by banks declined from the 1970s through the 1990s and then leveled off near 24 percent in the past decade.”
  2. E2 Bank and Nonbank Lending over the past 70 years FDIC Quarterly (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) · 2019

    “In second quarter 2019, GSEs held 63 percent of residential mortgages outstanding.”
  3. E3 Bank and Nonbank Lending over the past 70 years FDIC Quarterly (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) · 2019

    “From the 1980s to about 2005, the bank share of non-GSE loans fell and then recovered, with a more pronounced rebound since the financial crisis that started in 2007.”
  4. E4 Trends in Mortgage Origination and Servicing FDIC Quarterly (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) · 2019

    “Nearly all securitization now occurs through entities with government support”

Reasoning

Per E1, the bank share of mortgages outstanding "leveled off near 24 percent in the past decade", so it stayed roughly flat over 2014–2019 rather than rising sharply. E2 and E4 show that government-backed funding remained dominant: GSEs held 63 percent of residential mortgages in Q2 2019, and nearly all securitization ran through government-supported entities. E3 notes a pronounced rebound in banks' share of non-GSE loans since the financial crisis. That points to some growth within a narrower segment, but it does not show a reversal of government-backed dominance. Because E1's figure is approximate and E3 shows a rebound in banks' share of non-GSE loans, a different measure from the overall share the criteria use, the verdict is mostly true rather than fully true.

Cite this claim

Bill Ackman, “Banks are not likely to step back in and provide meaningful mortgage investment.” (said 5 May 2014). Verdict: mostly true. Reliability API, claim c_00db2025e4e6, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_00db2025e4e6

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Bill Ackman, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

More prediction claims by Bill Ackman

  1. Mixed Prediction August 2024
    “In its land sales segment, the company is on track to generate nearly $300 million in full-year profits.”

    Howard Hughes' land sales segment is on track to generate nearly $300 million in full-year 2024 profits.

  2. Mixed Prediction August 2024
    “The launch of Smoked Brisket for a limited time starting in September, one of the company's most requested menu items, should further improve trends.”

    Chipotle's limited-time Smoked Brisket launch starting in September 2024 should further improve sales trends.

  3. Mostly true Prediction August 2024
    “We believe that UMG's underperformance this quarter will prove to be short-term in nature and does not impact our view of UMG's medium and long-term growth prospects.”

    Pershing Square believed Universal Music Group's underperformance in the latest quarter would prove short-term and said it did not change its view of UMG's medium and long-term growth prospects.

  4. Resolved true Prediction August 2024
    “Chipotle is on track to open approximately 300 new restaurants this year, and expects to more than double its store base to at least 7,000 locations in North America over time.”

    Chipotle is on track to open approximately 300 new restaurants in 2024 and expects to more than double its store base to at least 7,000 North American locations over time.

  5. Resolved true Prediction August 2024
    “CPKC has made considerable progress on realizing revenue synergies despite a challenging freight environment, and now expects to exit 2024 with C$800 million of new business.”

    CPKC expects to exit 2024 with C$800 million of new business from revenue synergies.

All of them

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.