Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
80 72 88 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
70 62 78 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 2 promises resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 75 (likely 69 to 80, high confidence), from 79 claims: 35 factual claims, 44 predictions. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Scott Alexander's claims
19 claims
“I’m continuing to work on modeling (and maybe one day automating) some parts of AI grantmaking”
Scott Alexander, ACX author 19 October 2026 Open Thread 456 (Astral Codex Ten)
Scott Alexander is continuing to work on modeling, and maybe later automating, parts of AI grantmaking.
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Reasoning
His ongoing internal work on grantmaking modeling is known only to him.
Cite this claim
Scott Alexander, “Scott Alexander is continuing to work on modeling, and maybe later automating, parts of AI grantmaking.” (said 19 October 2026). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_ff8770547b23, method 0.1.0+8bea457b. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_ff8770547b23
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Scott Alexander? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.