Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
80 72 88 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
70 62 78 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 2 promises resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 75 (likely 69 to 80, high confidence), from 79 claims: 35 factual claims, 44 predictions. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Scott Alexander's claims
19 claims
“AI is a (bigger/equal/smaller) political issue than abortion: 20% / 20% / 60%”
Scott Alexander, blogger 20 February 2023 Grading My 2018 Predictions For 2023 (Astral Codex Ten)
He gave a 60% probability that by 2028 AI would be a smaller political issue than abortion, with 20% each for bigger and equal.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Reasoning
deadline 2028 is after 2026-11-04
Cite this claim
Scott Alexander, “He gave a 60% probability that by 2028 AI would be a smaller political issue than abortion, with 20% each for bigger and equal.” (said 20 February 2023). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_f30e2b8239da, method 0.1.0+8bea457b. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_f30e2b8239da
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Scott Alexander? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.