Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
82 76 88 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
61 47 75 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
67 46 85
All types combined: 77 (likely 72 to 82, high confidence), from 84 claims: 63 factual claims, 16 predictions, 5 promises. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Nate Silver's claims
10 claims
“Based on FLIPR’s current projections, we expect statewide ticket-splitting to decrease even further, with a median gap of just six points in 2026.”
Nate Silver, author, Silver Bulletin 23 October 2026 Do these Senate-governor splits make sense? (Silver Bulletin)
FLIPR projects the median margin gap between statewide contests in 2026 will be about six points.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Reasoning
deadline 2026 is after 2026-11-04
Cite this claim
Nate Silver, “FLIPR projects the median margin gap between statewide contests in 2026 will be about six points.” (said 23 October 2026). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_b962a780cb0a, method 0.1.0+28da144b. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_b962a780cb0a
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Nate Silver? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.