Scott Alexander gave a 95% probability that North Korea's government would survive 2016 without a large civil war or revolt.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
What would count as true or false
A factual claim about what Scott Alexander wrote in his January 2016 predictions post. True: the post lists 'North Korea's government will survive the year without large civil war/revolt' at 95%. Mostly true: 95% is given for an essentially identical proposition. Mostly false: the item appears at a different probability. False: there is no such item. The actual outcome in North Korea is not tested.
Set before the research began.
Reasoning
No evidence with a verified quote was found apart from the claim's own source, so the claim was not judged.
Cite this claim
Scott Alexander, “Scott Alexander gave a 95% probability that North Korea's government would survive 2016 without a large civil war or revolt.” (said 25 January 2016). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_f395ea11ce53, method 0.1.0+8bea457b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_f395ea11ce53
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Scott Alexander
-
Mostly true
“Global existential risks will hopefully not be a big part of the 2018-2023 period.”
Global existential risks will hopefully not be a big part of the 2018-2023 period.
-
Resolved true
“Paris Agreement still in effect, most countries generally making good-faith effort to comply: 80%”
-
Resolved false
“If they are, it will be because somebody did something incredibly stupid or awful with infectious diseases.”
-
Mixed
“Situation in Israel looks more worse than better: 70%”
The situation in Israel will look more worse than better at the end of 2017.
-
Mixed
“ISIS will not continue to exist as a state entity in Iraq/Syria: 50%”
ISIS will no longer exist as a state entity in Iraq/Syria by the end of 2017.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.