Current AI, being an approximation to intelligence rather than the real thing, will never really be trustworthy.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
A 'never' prediction with no horizon and vague 'trustworthy' that cannot be settled.
Cite this claim
Gary Marcus, “Current AI, being an approximation to intelligence rather than the real thing, will never really be trustworthy.” (said 29 December 2021). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_f202f154eadf, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_f202f154eadf
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Gary Marcus
-
Resolved true
“Guardrails (a la ChatGPT) may be in place, but the guardrails will teeter between being too weak (beaten by “jailbreaks”) and too strong (rejecting some perfectly reasonable requests).”
-
Mostly true
““Alignment” between what humans want and what machines do will continue to be a critical, unsolved problem.”
-
Mostly true
“Some of its advice will be head-scratchingly bad.”
-
Mostly true
“GPT-5 will surely be better, a lot better than GPT-4.”
-
Resolved true
“GPT-5 really is about to drop, no foolin’.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.