ClaimsBalaji Srinivasan

“This may be why many doctors were not going on the record over the past few weeks to speak about equipment shortages: fear of retaliation.”

Balaji Srinivasan, author of X post 28 March 2020 Post by @balajis on X, 2020-03-28 (X)

Factual Biosecurity

Fear of retaliation may be why many doctors did not go on the record in recent weeks about equipment shortages.

Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.

Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?

What would count as true or false

Judge as of 2020-03-28. The claim is strongly hedged ('may be'), so it asserts only a plausible explanation, backed by evidence available by that date. TRUE: by about 2020-03-28, credible reporting documented US doctors or other clinicians being threatened, disciplined or fired, or fearing retaliation, for speaking publicly about equipment or PPE shortages, including clinicians citing fear of retaliation as a reason for staying anonymous. MOSTLY TRUE: such reporting existed but was limited (a few cases), or covered nurses more than doctors. MIXED: retaliation fears were reported, but contemporaneous evidence points mainly to other reasons for anonymity (e.g. hospital media policies without fear of reprisal). MOSTLY FALSE: such reports appeared only after 2020-03-28, or the premise is wrong (doctors were widely speaking on the record by then). FALSE: the evidence shows clinicians were not deterred by retaliation fears and no retaliation threats were reported.

Set before the research began.

Evidence (4)

  1. E1 Hospitals Muzzle Doctors and Nurses on PPE, COVID-19 Cases Medscape · 25 March 2020

    “The surgeon, who works in a COVID-19 hot spot in the Northeast, spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of employer retribution.”
  2. E2 Hospitals Muzzle Doctors and Nurses on PPE, COVID-19 Cases Medscape · 25 March 2020

    “The silencing of physicians by hospitals about PPE shortages and other COVID-19 issues has become widespread, said Nisha Mehta, MD, a physician advocate and community leader who writes about PPE on social media.”
  3. E3 Banner Nurses, Docs on COVID-19 Frontlines Say They're 'Treated As Expendable' Phoenix New Times · 28 March 2020

    “Banner administrators told the clinic that health care workers could use personal protective equipment only for suspected COVID-19 patients, and if those workers don’t follow the rules, he said, higher-ups have threatened them with disciplinary action.”
  4. E4 “We are desperate”: Trump’s inaction has created a crisis with protective medical gear Vox · 22 March 2020

    “many of whom requested anonymity because they did not have permission from their hospitals to speak with the media”

Reasoning

Medscape reported on 2020-03-25 that a surgeon in a Northeast COVID-19 hot spot spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of employer retribution (E1). The same article quoted a physician advocate saying hospitals' silencing of doctors about PPE shortages had become widespread (E2). Vox reported that clinicians asked for anonymity because they did not have hospital permission to speak to the media (E4), and Phoenix New Times reported threats of discipline over PPE use (E3). Together, this reporting from before the claim date meets the TRUE criterion: credible sources described doctors fearing retaliation for speaking publicly about equipment shortages.

Cite this claim

Balaji Srinivasan, “Fear of retaliation may be why many doctors did not go on the record in recent weeks about equipment shortages.” (said 28 March 2020). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_e0d722dc1f56, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_e0d722dc1f56

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Balaji Srinivasan, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

More factual claims by Balaji Srinivasan

  1. Mostly true Factual 31 March 2020
    “Peter Thiel called it five years ago.”

    Peter Thiel had warned about biomedical red tape about five years before March 2020.

  2. Resolved true Factual 30 March 2020
    “But Europe has reported low quality masks and tests imported from China.”

    Europe has reported low quality masks and tests imported from China.

  3. Mostly true Factual 13 March 2020
    “So the short version is that you take a swab, collect a sample from the patient's mouth or nose, you send it to a lab and you get back a positive or negative test result.”

    COVID-19 testing involves taking a swab from the patient's mouth or nose, sending it to a lab, and receiving a positive or negative result.

  4. Resolved true Factual 13 March 2020
    “And it's about about 10 percent.”

    If about 100 people in San Francisco had the virus, there would be about a 10 percent chance that a 1,000-person gathering includes an infected person.

  5. Resolved true Factual 13 March 2020
    “Even though it's called real time PCR. It's not it's not that fast.”

    Real-time PCR is not especially fast; 'real time' refers to something different.

All of them

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.