ClaimsBalaji Srinivasan

“And it's about about 10 percent.”

Balaji Srinivasan, interviewee 13 March 2020 #78 Balaji Srinivasan: Exploring COVID-19 — The Knowledge Project (HappyScribe)

Factual Biosecurity

If about 100 people in San Francisco had the virus, there would be about a 10 percent chance that a 1,000-person gathering includes an infected person.

Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.

Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?

What would count as true or false

Judged as of 2020-03-13, as a calculation. Under the stated assumptions (100 infected among about 880,000 residents, random mixing, a 1,000-person office), the probability that at least one person in the office is infected is 1 − (1 − 100/880,000)^1000, which is about 10.7%. True if the correct calculation gives roughly 9–12%. Mostly true if it gives roughly 7–9% or 12–15%. Mixed if it gives 5–7% or 15–20%. Mostly false if it gives 3–5% or 20–30%. False if it falls outside those bounds.

Set before the research began.

Evidence (2)

  1. E1 Milpitas, Tracy Lead Bay Area Population Growth Silicon Valley One World · 26 June 2020

    “San Francisco +0.1 percent 881,549”
  2. E2 Simple mathematical modelling approaches to assessing the transmission risk of SARS-CoV-2 at gatherings PubMed Central (peer-reviewed journal article by other authors) · 7 May 2021

    “Introduction risk can be broadly assessed with the population prevalence and the size of the gathering, while transmission risk at a gathering is mainly driven by the gathering size.”

Reasoning

E1 puts San Francisco's population at 881,549, which matches the stated figure of about 880,000. Under random mixing, the chance that a 1,000-person office has at least one infected person is 1 − (1 − 100/880,000)^1000 ≈ 10.7%. That is inside the 9–12% band the criteria set for true. E2 backs the method: an independent paper says the chance an infected person is present depends on how common the infection is in the population and on the size of the group.

Cite this claim

Balaji Srinivasan, “If about 100 people in San Francisco had the virus, there would be about a 10 percent chance that a 1,000-person gathering includes an infected person.” (said 13 March 2020). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_22834d8056be, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_22834d8056be

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Balaji Srinivasan, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

More factual claims by Balaji Srinivasan

  1. Mostly true Factual 31 March 2020
    “Peter Thiel called it five years ago.”

    Peter Thiel had warned about biomedical red tape about five years before March 2020.

  2. Resolved true Factual 30 March 2020
    “But Europe has reported low quality masks and tests imported from China.”

    Europe has reported low quality masks and tests imported from China.

  3. Resolved true Factual 28 March 2020
    “This may be why many doctors were not going on the record over the past few weeks to speak about equipment shortages: fear of retaliation.”

    Fear of retaliation may be why many doctors did not go on the record in recent weeks about equipment shortages.

  4. Mostly true Factual 13 March 2020
    “So the short version is that you take a swab, collect a sample from the patient's mouth or nose, you send it to a lab and you get back a positive or negative test result.”

    COVID-19 testing involves taking a swab from the patient's mouth or nose, sending it to a lab, and receiving a positive or negative result.

  5. Resolved true Factual 13 March 2020
    “Even though it's called real time PCR. It's not it's not that fast.”

    Real-time PCR is not especially fast; 'real time' refers to something different.

All of them

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.