Risk-taking agents building portfolios under tail constraints are largely ignorant about the remaining properties of the return probability distributions.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
Claim about agents' ignorance is a vague generalization about inner knowledge, not testable.
Cite this claim
Nassim Taleb, “Risk-taking agents building portfolios under tail constraints are largely ignorant about the remaining properties of the return probability distributions.” (said 24 December 2014). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_bc014a68dd41, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_bc014a68dd41
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Nassim Taleb
-
Mixed
“My point was that bike lanes contribute to IMPROVEMENT in well-being and happiness WITHOUT generating economic growth.”
-
Resolved true
“The entire article misses the point that Spitz has been bullish past 3 years.”
-
Mixed
“It is worth noting that binary options on financial”
-
Mostly true
“they are banned by most corresponding regulators, as they are”
-
Mostly false
“We know that economic forecasts work no better than astrology”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.