The Trump administration's anticipated tax and economic changes will probably be enacted in a watered-down version.
Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
What would count as true or false
Judged by the end of 2018, comparing the tax and economic legislation actually enacted with the Trump administration's proposals as anticipated in September 2017 (for example, the 15% corporate rate, the 15% pass-through rate, repealing the estate tax and AMT, and large-scale infrastructure spending). True: legislation was enacted, and it was clearly scaled back from those proposals on most major items (for example, a higher corporate rate than proposed, or provisions dropped or made temporary). Mostly true: legislation was enacted and was watered down on some prominent items, but it delivered most of the anticipated changes largely intact. Mixed: watered down in about as many major respects as it was delivered in full or exceeded. Mostly false: the enacted changes matched or went beyond the anticipated proposals in nearly all respects. False: the enacted changes matched or exceeded the proposals in full, or nothing was enacted (nothing enacted is not a 'version' of the anticipated changes).
Set before the research began.
Evidence (3)
-
E1 Effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: A preliminary analysis | Brookings Brookings Institution · 9 March 2022
“most prominently cutting the maximum corporate income tax rate to 21 percent, redesigning international tax rules, and providing a deduction for pass-through income.”
-
E2 Effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: A preliminary analysis | Brookings Brookings Institution · 9 March 2022
“Other major changes include expensing of equipment investment; elimination of personal and dependent exemptions, the tax on people who do not obtain adequate health insurance coverage, and the corporate alternative minimum tax; and increases in the standard deduction, the estate tax exemption, and the individual alternative minimum tax exemption.”
-
E3 Effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: A preliminary analysis | Brookings Brookings Institution · 9 March 2022
“It phases out many provisions over time, and it leaves US revenues significantly below what is needed to address long-term fiscal shortfalls.”
Reasoning
Legislation was enacted: the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. It set the maximum corporate rate at 21 percent, not the 15 percent proposed, and it gave pass-through income a deduction rather than a set 15 percent rate (E1). The estate tax and the individual AMT were kept, with their exemptions raised instead of repealed; only the corporate AMT was eliminated (E2). The law also phases out many provisions over time (E3). So the enacted law was scaled back from the anticipated proposals on most major items, which matches the criteria's description of "true".
Cite this claim
Ray Dalio, “The Trump administration's anticipated tax and economic changes will probably be enacted in a watered-down version.” (said 12 September 2017). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_aed315ab6d32, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_aed315ab6d32
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Ray Dalio
-
Mostly true
“Yeah, we're going to have about a 7% deficit as a percentage of GDP.”
If current congressional plans go forward, the US federal deficit will be about 7% of GDP.
-
Mostly true
“Over the next five years, you’re going to see a lot of decoupling.”
There will be a lot of US-China decoupling over the five years following October 2020.
-
Mostly true
“I think you will see greater interest rate cuts as you start to see the world economy starting to slow down.”
Greater interest rate cuts will occur as the world economy slows.
-
Resolved true
“In an evolutionary way, over the next one, two and three years, there will be a turn for the worse, yes.”
-
Resolved true
“I think that in the next two years, let's say prior to the next election, there's probably a 40 percent chance of a recession.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.