Taleb offers a protection package to clients and it works.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
The second judge would not resolve this claim; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
What would count as true or false
Judge as of 2009. The claim has two parts: (a) Taleb, through his own firm or an affiliated vehicle such as Universa Investments, where he was an adviser, offered clients a tail-risk protection product in 2009; and (b) it 'works', meaning it paid off in tail events such as the 2008 crash. True: documented evidence shows the protection product was offered and that it delivered large positive returns in the 2008 crisis or a similar tail event, e.g. reported fund returns. Mostly true: both parts hold, but the product was run by an affiliated firm rather than personally by Taleb, or the performance evidence is reported rather than audited. Mixed: the product was offered, but whether it works is unproven or the evidence is mixed. Mostly false: the product was offered, but evidence shows it lost money or failed to protect in the relevant tail event, or Taleb had no meaningful connection to it. False: no such product connected to Taleb existed in 2009.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (4)
-
E1 October Pain Was 'Black Swan' Gain - WSJ.com Wall Street Journal (Dow Jones), copy hosted on fooledbyrandomness.com · 3 November 2008 Own record
“were up by a range of 65% to 115% in October, according to a person”
-
E2 October Pain Was 'Black Swan' Gain - WSJ.com Wall Street Journal (Dow Jones), copy hosted on fooledbyrandomness.com · 3 November 2008 Own record
“consults with Universa's traders, the Santa Monica, Calif., fund is owned and managed by”
-
E3 Protect Your Tail Forbes · 8 June 2011
“As the Standard & Poor's 500 dropped 38.5% by the end of 2008, the fund increased its investors' money tenfold.”
-
E4 October Pain Was 'Black Swan' Gain - WSJ.com Wall Street Journal (Dow Jones), copy hosted on fooledbyrandomness.com · 3 November 2008 Own record
“Mr. Taleb's previous fund, Empirica Capital, which used similar tactics, shut down in 2004 after several”
Reasoning
The evidence reports large gains for a fund in October 2008 [E1] and over 2008 [E3]. However, the only independent item [E3] does not name Universa or Taleb, and the non-independent WSJ quotes [E1, E2] do not show that Taleb was connected to that fund or offered a protection product in 2009. Part (a) of the criteria is therefore not settled.
Cite this claim
Nassim Taleb, “Taleb offers a protection package to clients and it works.” (said 2009). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_a2900f0e6bbd, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_a2900f0e6bbd
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Nassim Taleb
-
Mixed
“My point was that bike lanes contribute to IMPROVEMENT in well-being and happiness WITHOUT generating economic growth.”
-
Resolved true
“The entire article misses the point that Spitz has been bullish past 3 years.”
-
Mixed
“It is worth noting that binary options on financial”
-
Mostly true
“they are banned by most corresponding regulators, as they are”
-
Mostly false
“We know that economic forecasts work no better than astrology”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.