Decision-makers who turned down an early computer saw no importance in computation.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
Concerns the inner views and reasoning of unspecified decision-makers; too vague to test.
Cite this claim
Ray Kurzweil, “Decision-makers who turned down an early computer saw no importance in computation.” (said 22 August 2023). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_91b9f076c6a7, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_91b9f076c6a7
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Ray Kurzweil
-
Mostly false
“It’s true of every type of technology.”
Exponential growth applies to every type of technology, not just computers.
-
Mostly true
“Neuralink, for example, is implanted in two paralyzed patients.”
Neuralink has been implanted in two paralyzed patients who can control a computer with their brain.
-
Mixed
“Yet the “immune system” that has evolved in response to this challenge has been largely effective.”
The 'immune system' that evolved in response to computer viruses has been largely effective.
-
Mostly false
“Although destructive, self-replicating software entities do cause damage from time to time, the injury is but a small fraction–much less than one-tenth of 1 percent–of the benefit we receive from the…”
-
Mostly false
“That was not true a year ago. But that’s true today.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.