The next US recession will come sooner than the normal roughly five-year interval, because of the size of the debt.
Resolved false The record shows it did not happen or was not so.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
What would count as true or false
The 'normal roughly five-year interval' is measured from the end of the previous US recession (NBER trough, June 2009). True: the next NBER-dated recession began (peak) before about June 2014. Mostly false: it began between June 2014 and mid-2015, which is roughly the normal interval and not clearly sooner. False: it began after mid-2015, meaning the expansion lasted longer than normal.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (2)
-
E1 Business Cycle Dating Committee Announcement June 8, 2020 National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) · 8 June 2020
“The committee has determined that a peak in monthly economic activity occurred in the US economy in February 2020. The peak marks the end of the expansion that began in June 2009 and the beginning of a recession.”
-
E2 Business Cycle Dating Committee Announcement June 8, 2020 National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) · 8 June 2020
“The expansion lasted 128 months, the longest in the history of US business cycles dating back to 1854.”
Reasoning
NBER's Business Cycle Dating Committee found that the expansion that began in June 2009 ran without interruption until a peak in February 2020 (E1). It lasted 128 months, the longest on record (E2). So no NBER-dated recession began before June 2014. The next one began well after mid-2015, which the criteria classify as false.
Cite this claim
Ray Dalio, “The next US recession will come sooner than the normal roughly five-year interval, because of the size of the debt.” (said June 2010). Verdict: resolved false. Reliability API, claim c_8fcb1c7421b1, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_8fcb1c7421b1
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Ray Dalio
-
Mostly true
“Yeah, we're going to have about a 7% deficit as a percentage of GDP.”
If current congressional plans go forward, the US federal deficit will be about 7% of GDP.
-
Mostly true
“Over the next five years, you’re going to see a lot of decoupling.”
There will be a lot of US-China decoupling over the five years following October 2020.
-
Mostly true
“I think you will see greater interest rate cuts as you start to see the world economy starting to slow down.”
Greater interest rate cuts will occur as the world economy slows.
-
Resolved true
“In an evolutionary way, over the next one, two and three years, there will be a turn for the worse, yes.”
-
Resolved true
“I think that in the next two years, let's say prior to the next election, there's probably a 40 percent chance of a recession.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.