ClaimsNouriel Roubini

“We don’t have hard data yet on what exactly is happening in the market, but we know that prices of homes are sluggish.”

Nouriel Roubini, interviewed in New York Magazine 25 September 2006 The Coming Housing and Economic Crash: My Interview Today with New York Magazine (EconoMonitor) archived copy

Factual Economics and markets

As of September 2006 there was not yet hard data on exactly what was happening in the market, but home prices were sluggish.

Mostly true True in substance, wrong in a detail.

Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?

What would count as true or false

Judge as of 2006-09-25, for the New York housing market. The claim has two parts: (a) hard data on the current state of the market was not yet available, a statement about publication lags; and (b) home prices were sluggish, meaning flat or weakening growth. True: the price data available around September 2006 (e.g. Case-Shiller NY, OFHEO, NAR or local brokerage reports) shows flat, slowing or declining NY home prices, and the most recent official data then lagged by months. Mostly true: prices were slowing but still rising moderately, or there was some recent hard data but it was limited. Mixed: one part holds and the other does not. Mostly false: timely hard data clearly existed and showed prices only mildly softening. False: data from that period shows NY home prices still rising strongly, with no slowdown.

Set before the research began.

Evidence (4)

  1. E1 FRB: Beige Book--New York--September 6, 2006 Federal Reserve Board · 6 September 2006

    “Manhattan's co-op and condo market slowed further in July and early August. The inventory of homes on the market is reported to have risen noticeably, and units are staying on the market for longer.”
  2. E2 [PDF] Regional Activity - HUD User U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD User)

    “Despite evidence of slowing in the sales market, price increases for existing homes are still occurring, but the rate of appreciation has slowed, particularly in New York.”
  3. E3 [PDF] Regional Activity - HUD User U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD User)

    “According to data from the New York State Association of REALTORS®, the median price of an existing single-family home in New York increased 8 percent to $262,000 for the 12-month period ending June 2006 compared with a year ago.”
  4. E4 [PDF] Regional Activity - HUD User U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD User)

    “The reduced number of sales and an increase in the unsold inventory contributed to lower price appreciation and an increase in the amount of time required to sell a home.”

Reasoning

The Fed's September 6, 2006 Beige Book reports that Manhattan's co-op and condo market slowed further in July and early August, with inventory rising and units staying on the market longer (E1). HUD's regional summary says New York price appreciation had slowed, partly because of fewer sales and more unsold homes (E2, E4). However, prices were still rising: the statewide median single-family price was up 8 percent in the 12 months to June 2006 (E3). So prices were slowing but still rising [E2][E3], and the most recent data available ran from June to early August [E1][E3], which fits the "mostly true" criterion.

Cite this claim

Nouriel Roubini, “As of September 2006 there was not yet hard data on exactly what was happening in the market, but home prices were sluggish.” (said 25 September 2006). Verdict: mostly true. Reliability API, claim c_76eab6c3a0cf, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_76eab6c3a0cf

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Nouriel Roubini, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

More factual claims by Nouriel Roubini

  1. Mostly true Factual October 2026
    “this year’s Iran War, which caused the largest energy shock since the oil crises of the 1970s.”

    The 2026 Iran War caused the largest energy shock since the oil crises of the 1970s.

  2. Mixed Factual November 2025
    “Although there was a massive boom in AI-related investments, uncertainties caused by President Donald Trump’s tariffs and other polices curtailed growth in the second half of the year”

    Despite a massive boom in AI-related investment in 2025, uncertainty caused by President Trump's tariffs and other policies curtailed US growth in the second half of the year.

  3. Mixed Factual 3 January 2023
    “Stuff that is tech-related is hit by rising interest rates because they are long-duration assets, [which] are more sensitive to interest rates than shorter-duration assets.”

    Tech-related stocks, as long-duration assets, are hit by rising interest rates more than shorter-duration assets.

  4. Mostly false Factual 3 January 2023
    “Food prices were already spiking before the invasion because you have desertification of lots of parts of the world, and therefore the food supply is limited.”

    Food prices were already spiking before the invasion because desertification in many parts of the world limits the food supply.

  5. Mostly true Factual 3 January 2023
    “All the zombie institutions that survived before because we had negative [interest] rates, quantitative easing [and] credit easing, now face rising debt servicing ratios.”

    All the zombie institutions that survived because of negative interest rates, quantitative easing and credit easing now face rising debt servicing ratios.

All of them

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.