The reason we do not drive stick shifts is the minority rule.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
The causal explanation for why people stopped driving manual cars is not testable.
Cite this claim
Nassim Taleb, “The reason we do not drive stick shifts is the minority rule.” (said 10 July 2017). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_6d5efe5a5385, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_6d5efe5a5385
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Nassim Taleb
-
Mixed
“My point was that bike lanes contribute to IMPROVEMENT in well-being and happiness WITHOUT generating economic growth.”
-
Resolved true
“The entire article misses the point that Spitz has been bullish past 3 years.”
-
Mixed
“It is worth noting that binary options on financial”
-
Mostly true
“they are banned by most corresponding regulators, as they are”
-
Mostly false
“We know that economic forecasts work no better than astrology”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.