Oil faces a short-term glut caused by U.S. fracking.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
The second judge would not resolve this claim; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
What would count as true or false
Judge as of January 2016. True: EIA/IEA data show global oil supply exceeding demand (inventory builds) in 2015 to early 2016, with growth in US shale (fracking) output identified as the primary cause. Mostly true: there was a glut, and US fracking was a major but not dominant cause, for example alongside OPEC/Saudi refusal to cut output or weak demand. Mixed: there was a glut, but analysts attribute it about equally or mainly to other factors, with fracking one contributor among several. Mostly false: there was a glut but US fracking played only a minor role, or the oversupply was not short-term. False: there was no oil oversupply at the time.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (3)
-
E1 Rethinking the oil market in the aftermath of the 2014–16 price slump CEPR (VoxEU column by Rabah Arezki) · 18 August 2016
“The evidence suggests that supply factors are better at explaining the initial collapse in oil prices in 2014 than demand factors. A host of issues are involved, including the rapid increase in shale production in the US; a change in strategy in Saudi Arabia, the largest member of Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC);”
-
E2 Rethinking the oil market in the aftermath of the 2014–16 price slump CEPR (VoxEU column by Rabah Arezki) · 18 August 2016
“Demand factors have also played an important role (Baumeister and Hamilton 2015). Yet oil demand has grown unabated since 2011, when growth in emerging markets first slowed.”
-
E3 Rethinking the oil market in the aftermath of the 2014–16 price slump CEPR (VoxEU column by Rabah Arezki) · 18 August 2016
“These factors have persisted. The dynamic adjustment of investment in the oil sector to lower prices will continue to shape the speed and extent of any market recovery (IMF 2015).”
Reasoning
The evidence says supply factors, including the rapid rise in US shale production and Saudi Arabia's change in strategy, best explain the 2014 price collapse, and that demand also played a role (E1, E2). It does not rank these causes or give supply, demand or inventory data for 2015 to early 2016, so it cannot show how large fracking's share was, which the criteria need in order to choose between true, mostly true and mixed.
Cite this claim
Jeremy Grantham, “Oil faces a short-term glut caused by U.S. fracking.” (said January 2016). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_62a6302fba08, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_62a6302fba08
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Jeremy Grantham
-
Mostly false
“the lowest rates in the history of man,”
Bonds currently offer the lowest interest rates in human history.
-
Mostly true
“31 years later, the land is not back, and stocks are not back.”
-
Mostly true
“one of the two or three lowest relative points in history”
-
Mostly true
“Now we have, since ChatGPT and October and November last year, we have a new little flurry of interest that is very concentrated.”
-
Mixed
“in 1974 the market did turn up, after a horrific 62% real decline in two years, exactly”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.