SARS-CoV-2 is not necessarily going to evolve to become less lethal, since it is already highly contagious and asymptomatic for long periods.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
'Not necessarily' hedged prediction with no horizon is not testable.
Cite this claim
Balaji Srinivasan, “SARS-CoV-2 is not necessarily going to evolve to become less lethal, since it is already highly contagious and asymptomatic for long periods.” (said 13 March 2020). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_2c51f020e1e0, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_2c51f020e1e0
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Balaji Srinivasan
-
Mostly true
“Just like the first bailout greased the skids, this won’t be the last lockdown.”
-
Mixed
“And it may turn out that we need to make testing extremely routine, which would basically mainstream genomics.”
Testing may need to become extremely routine, effectively mainstreaming genomics.
-
Mixed
“I think we're going to see the Great Firewall of China, where they'll be sequencing and testing the heck out of everybody, scanning the country constantly to see, OK, is a virus rising and then…”
-
Mostly true
“But it may turn out that we tested very, very large number of people because there may be more spreaders than we think.”
-
Mostly true
“Now that's going to go to real time, meaning within a day or an hour before you get on the flight.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.