Scott Alexander tentatively suggested that a realistic version of the scenario might mean roughly a 33% decrease in the crime rate per 600 years.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
A hypothetical modelled scenario with no real-world test or horizon.
Cite this claim
Scott Alexander, “Scott Alexander tentatively suggested that a realistic version of the scenario might mean roughly a 33% decrease in the crime rate per 600 years.” (said 10 December 2024). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_239f07827535, method 0.1.0+8bea457b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_239f07827535
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Scott Alexander
-
Mixed
“The culture wars will continue to be marked by both sides scoring an unrelenting series of own-goals, with the victory going to whoever can make their supporters shut up first.”
-
Mixed
“Religion will continue to retreat from US public life.”
Religion will continue to retreat from US public life through 2023.
-
Mostly true
“Our scenario focuses on coding in particular because we think coding is what starts the intelligence explosion.”
The authors of the scenario think coding is what will start the intelligence explosion.
-
Mostly true
“We expect that as the AI labs become more capable, they tell the government about this because they want government contracts, they want government support.”
-
Mostly true
“In our scenario, that starts with cyber warfare, the government sees that these AIs are now as capable as the best human hackers, but can be deployed at humongous scale.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.