The 2026 elections will almost certainly include states with Senate and gubernatorial results splitting by party, similar to Vermont and Kansas in 2022.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
deadline 2026 is after 2026-11-04
Cite this claim
Nate Silver, “The 2026 elections will almost certainly include states with Senate and gubernatorial results splitting by party, similar to Vermont and Kansas in 2022.” (said 23 October 2026). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_0a40202ed4a0, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_0a40202ed4a0
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Nate Silver
-
Resolved true
“If the GOP takes over the House next year one thing you can be pretty sure of is COVID panels/investigations.”
-
Mixed
“Children's toys are gonna become much more expensive because they're made in countries like Vietnam in Southeast Asia that are heavily taraffed.”
-
Mostly true
“I think people might understand with Kamala Harris that it's inherently a difficult circumstance and a little bit of a long shot bid, but that her chances are probably better than Biden.”
-
Mixed
“Most voters aren’t paying attention yet, and it will be nine months to a year before they do.”
-
Mostly false
“I’d argue that 1 (Biden winning) is more likely than 2 (Trump winning) which, in turn, is more likely than 3 (someone else winning).”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.