ClaimsPeople

Steven Pinker

Steven Pinker is listed by Harvard as the Johnstone Family Professor of Psychology, and he is the author of widely read books including The Language Instinct, The Better Angels of Our Nature and Enlightenment Now.

879 claims collected, 167 researched, 99 resolved. Report of 5 November 2026, method 0.1.0+28da144b.

Scores by kind of claim

Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.

  • Factual claims

    Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?

    74 68 79

    High confidence, 97 factual claims resolved. From 19 documents, 2002 to 2026; 19 documents sampled from 36 candidates found.

    Not scored: 49 unresolvable, 2 checkable only against their own records.

  • Predictions

    Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?

    Insufficient record: 1 prediction resolved, 5 needed for a score.

    Not scored: 12 unresolvable. 2 more fall due later.

    Does not yet allow for how likely each prediction was when made.

  • Promises

    Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?

    Insufficient record: 1 promise resolved, 5 needed for a score.

    Not scored: 2 unresolvable.

All types combined: 74 (likely 68 to 79, high confidence), from 97 claims: 97 factual claims. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.

Steven Pinker's claims

600 claims · page 1 of 6

600 claims, sorted by newest said. Choose a claim to read it in full.
VerdictKindSaidClaimTopic
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 Losing some ground, by the way, always happens when you plot curves of progress. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 But when it comes to coordination, something that’s arbitrary can be highly rational. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 It’s much easier to think in zero-sum terms than to recognise the unintuitive positive sum benefits of trade and cooperation. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 There’s something inherently disinterested and universal about reason. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 You didn’t need David Hume in order to go out and capture slaves and, and, uh, and start an empire. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 We don’t even think through the meaning of the words. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 So I can’t deny that there might be some self-deception simply because I study people and that’s the way people are. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 It’s the ideas that count, not the people. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 And our social relationships are ratified by common knowledge. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 Common knowledge refers to the state in which I know something, you know it, I know that you know it, you know that I know it Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 There is no argument for driving on the left. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 So yes, I’m a big fan of Enlightenment ideals. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 which I would say led to some pretty catastrophic consequences. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 There’s a big argument for driving on the same side that everyone else is driving on. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 It’s not a question of what I think but what the data show. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 Human nature doesn’t find them particularly intuitive. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 common knowledge is necessary for coordination, for two people to be on the same page and make choices that benefit them both as long as… Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 Two people are friends or lovers or transactional partners because each one knows that they are. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 The conclusion I came to is that direct speech, blurting something out, is common knowledge. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 but I can’t convince you that that is a moral imperative. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 My own personality should be irrelevant to what’s happening in the world. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 That is, you avoid common knowledge. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 It doesn’t just mean something that’s widely known, but something that’s known to be known. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 I think they’re defensible ideals. They’ve made us better off. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 11 Oct 2026 then by veiling your intentions in double-speak or euphemism you preserve the relationship while getting the message across. Not checkable · 11 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 I think it’s just a terrible analogy, for a lot of reasons. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 But in the case of AI, there is intelligent design, namely us. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 the neural networks, especially of the era, were just not very bright. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 It’s very hard to think of what those circumstances would be Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 It assumes exactly what is at issue, namely that these systems are going to be inherently concerned with their own survival. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 people let their imaginations run wild to think of intelligence as a miracle, as omniscience, as the ability to solve any problem. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 there’s no amount of human welfare that’s worth sacrificing for the welfare of an AI, like, zero Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 So we can’t know that AIs are not conscious, just as, you know, you can’t know that I’m not conscious. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 you get all of these maladaptive outcomes, all this cruelty and waste and competition and aggression, precisely because there was no… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 I don’t know what it means to say it’s better than all the things humans can do. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 So I would not deny thinking to AI. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 I don’t for a moment think that there is an inner life there. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 there may be another kind of history of ideas, sociology of ideas, in play, that has only recently come to light in some of the articles in… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 Although you’re right that the original founders of Wired magazine would have been, you know, techno-optimists and somewhat, you know, left… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 I can’t prove that a lifelike AI or robot would not be conscious. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 they were stochastic parrots Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 that train has kind of left the station when it comes to current AIs, which get a lot of their reactions, their judgements, their… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 It’s attributed these near-magical powers. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 there may be a kind of dread of AI that I think is somewhat misaligned with the reality – or at least dread of the role of AI in society… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 the problem of getting humans, for example, to act at your bidding, you know, short of coercion, is a really tough, maybe unsolvable… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 I think there’s a tendency to project what is a bogus hierarchy in the first place in evolutionary biology, and then to place AI and humans… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 Intelligence always consists of trading off multiple goals against each other. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 But these thought experiments are just outside of the world of everyday engineering. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 you don’t release a system, you don’t empower a system until you’ve, you know, tested the living daylights out of it. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 there are many reasons to think that that is impossible in principle. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 I think given the likelihood that there is no sentience going on in AI Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 I have no standing to challenge their understanding of how the AI works, to put it mildly. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 If it did, then I’d be much more worried. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 It’s a mechanism, it’s a gadget. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 I don’t think I could reasonably deny that a mouse is conscious, by similar logic. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 some intellectual discourse is probably contaminated by inter-elite status competition. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 since a lot of the progress has been driven by, you know, affluence, by technology, by markets, there’s almost a reflexive recoil among… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 some of the scenarios of human extermination kind of attribute near-magical powers to some future AI Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 the people who develop these tools aren’t necessarily the people who are best equipped to predict what their effects will be. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 In some strands, yes, you’re right that there was a kind of techno-liberalism coming out of Silicon Valley. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 There was, you know, the social media hostility – one might even say, you know, panic. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 Have me back. I will come back. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 I don’t use the word cult, but it kind of is a cult, to be honest Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 it is the people who are most enthralled to the existential risk way of thinking who seem to be most heedless of the everyday risk, the… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 I think that’s a very precise disanalogy, precisely because if the world consists of an entity like yourself, then you’ve got the luxury of… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 It’s my understanding of intelligence as a gadget rather than a superpower. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 there’s always a kind of moralistic contempt among intellectuals for technology and for commerce. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 So I think we just need more cause-and-effect, mechanical engineering thinking – no awe, no dread, no sci-fi, no thought experiments Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 I think the closest analogy was Chernobyl, where you did have a disaster caused by the rank incompetence of someone doing, you know, a… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 I am sympathetic to that point of view. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 But the kind of New York Times crowd was always very cold toward technology. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 the problem of subjective experience, you know, it’s the hardest intellectual problem, because we don’t know of any causal story that can… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 I think it’s a mistake to say that the thing that differentiates one human from another can just be extrapolated as an explanation for how… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 I think it’s illicit to anthropomorphise AI as being like humans, which are products of natural selection, when AIs are not products of… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 I’m not a creationist, I’m not an intelligent design theorist Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 That isn’t what an intelligent system does – maximising one simply stated goal with monomaniacal determination. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 my interest is not in AI except as a tool to understand natural intelligence. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 the paperclip argument, the argument that if you give an AI a goal of solving climate change, it’ll exterminate every last human, because… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 just to make sure, to reinforce, this is not a straw man Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 it’s a non sequitur to say it’ll wanna dominate us, wipe us out, whether accidentally or on purpose. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 It is completely reasonable to deny it to AIs. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 I think it just replicates the same fallacy of a scala naturae defined by intelligence Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 The previous iterations, like GPT-2, really were kind of bullshit generators that were statistical approximations. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 But there’s nothing that puts an AI in zero-sum competition with us. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 naturally look down on the people who are changing society without consulting them, like the people in tech, the people in commerce. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 doesn’t mean that they have a built-in motive to use them in order to exploit us, dominate us, exterminate us and so on. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 If you actually go back, there was always a kind of coolness to technology. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 it’s not omniscience, it’s not omnipotence, it’s not an uncanny ability to derive the truth of all propositions, the answer to all… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 It is absolutely not the case that any rational agent is willing to wreak any collateral damage in pursuit of one goal. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 And say I was wrong. I will do that. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 we shouldn’t assume that therefore they can solve any problem, such as, you know, persuade a human to make them immortal and never to cede… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 if that happened, then I would certainly reconsider. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 we can’t take for granted that with enough intelligence that will just automatically be solvable. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 Wipe every last one of them out – I’m not gonna shed any tears. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 they’re not thinking in language, but they are thinking, you know, with all of the information embodied in language. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 If there was a case of, say, instrumental convergence or misalignment, such that an AI system, given a laudable, desirable goal, ended up… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 These are gadgets. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 But there’s just no question that the current generation can do remarkable feats of intelligence. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 It’s just not a good analogy. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 AI intuitions are so contaminated by human intuitions that you really cannot take them at face value. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Back to the list

Not checkable

“Losing some ground, by the way, always happens when you plot curves of progress.”

Steven Pinker 11 October 2026 Steven Pinker: Something that's arbitrary can be highly rational (New Statesman)

Losing some ground, by the way, always happens when you plot curves of progress.

Not checkable An opinion, value judgement or statement with nothing to check.

Cite this claim

Steven Pinker, “Losing some ground, by the way, always happens when you plot curves of progress.” (said 11 October 2026). Verdict: not checkable. Reliability API, claim c_0d2fd11c0ba5, method 0.1.0+28da144b. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_0d2fd11c0ba5

Claims without a verdict

Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Steven Pinker? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.