ClaimsPeople

Steven Pinker

Steven Pinker is listed by Harvard as the Johnstone Family Professor of Psychology, and he is the author of widely read books including The Language Instinct, The Better Angels of Our Nature and Enlightenment Now.

879 claims collected, 167 researched, 99 resolved. Report of 5 November 2026, method 0.1.0+28da144b.

Scores by kind of claim

Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.

  • Factual claims

    Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?

    74 68 79

    High confidence, 97 factual claims resolved. From 19 documents, 2002 to 2026; 19 documents sampled from 36 candidates found.

    Not scored: 49 unresolvable, 2 checkable only against their own records.

  • Predictions

    Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?

    Insufficient record: 1 prediction resolved, 5 needed for a score.

    Not scored: 12 unresolvable. 2 more fall due later.

    Does not yet allow for how likely each prediction was when made.

  • Promises

    Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?

    Insufficient record: 1 promise resolved, 5 needed for a score.

    Not scored: 2 unresolvable.

All types combined: 74 (likely 68 to 79, high confidence), from 97 claims: 97 factual claims. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.

Steven Pinker's claims

879 claims, sorted by newest said. Choose a claim to read it in full.
VerdictKindSaidClaimTopic
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 I think it’s illicit to anthropomorphise AI as being like humans, which are products of natural selection, when AIs are not products of… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 I’m not a creationist, I’m not an intelligent design theorist Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 That isn’t what an intelligent system does – maximising one simply stated goal with monomaniacal determination. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 my interest is not in AI except as a tool to understand natural intelligence. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 the paperclip argument, the argument that if you give an AI a goal of solving climate change, it’ll exterminate every last human, because… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 just to make sure, to reinforce, this is not a straw man Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 it’s a non sequitur to say it’ll wanna dominate us, wipe us out, whether accidentally or on purpose. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Unresolvable Prediction 7 Oct 2026 Pinker suspects that robots able to ride mountain bikes will be specially engineered for it, and that ChatGPT will not be able to ride a mountain bike anytime soon, if ever. Prediction · 7 Oct 2026 AI capabilities
Mostly true Factual 7 Oct 2026 Computers have always been better than humans at some tasks, which is why they were adopted from the 1950s for databases and calculation. Factual · 7 Oct 2026 AI capabilities
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 It is completely reasonable to deny it to AIs. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 I think it just replicates the same fallacy of a scala naturae defined by intelligence Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not researched Factual 7 Oct 2026 Pinker was wrong in his earlier view that neural networks alone could not achieve human-matching intelligence including language. Factual · 7 Oct 2026 Their own work or organisation
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 The previous iterations, like GPT-2, really were kind of bullshit generators that were statistical approximations. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 But there’s nothing that puts an AI in zero-sum competition with us. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 naturally look down on the people who are changing society without consulting them, like the people in tech, the people in commerce. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 doesn’t mean that they have a built-in motive to use them in order to exploit us, dominate us, exterminate us and so on. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 If you actually go back, there was always a kind of coolness to technology. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Resolved true Factual 7 Oct 2026 AlphaGo operated in a closed universe governed by fixed rules, unlike the open-loop real world. Factual · 7 Oct 2026 AI capabilities
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 it’s not omniscience, it’s not omnipotence, it’s not an uncanny ability to derive the truth of all propositions, the answer to all… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Unresolvable Factual 7 Oct 2026 Airplanes, bridges, cars and chemical plants are not put into service without first being tested. Factual · 7 Oct 2026 AI safety and alignment
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 It is absolutely not the case that any rational agent is willing to wreak any collateral damage in pursuit of one goal. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 And say I was wrong. I will do that. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 we shouldn’t assume that therefore they can solve any problem, such as, you know, persuade a human to make them immortal and never to cede… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not researched Factual 7 Oct 2026 David Deutsch, in The Beginning of Infinity, suggests the only method of knowing the world is hypothesis testing against data and reality. Factual · 7 Oct 2026 Philosophy, ethics and society
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 if that happened, then I would certainly reconsider. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 we can’t take for granted that with enough intelligence that will just automatically be solvable. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 Wipe every last one of them out – I’m not gonna shed any tears. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 they’re not thinking in language, but they are thinking, you know, with all of the information embodied in language. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 If there was a case of, say, instrumental convergence or misalignment, such that an AI system, given a laudable, desirable goal, ended up… Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 These are gadgets. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not researched Factual 7 Oct 2026 Pinker said he thinks that, in Gary Marcus's most recent postings, Marcus has not embraced the idea that AI will exterminate every last human being and is concentrating more on foreseeable concrete risks, such as misuse by terrorists or saboteurs. Factual · 7 Oct 2026 AI safety and alignment
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 But there’s just no question that the current generation can do remarkable feats of intelligence. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not researched Factual 7 Oct 2026 Scaling of data and compute made AI systems smarter than Pinker would have predicted. Factual · 7 Oct 2026 AI capabilities
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 It’s just not a good analogy. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 7 Oct 2026 AI intuitions are so contaminated by human intuitions that you really cannot take them at face value. Not checkable · 7 Oct 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 Let’s agree that the provenance of an idea has little bearing on its validity: whether or not doomers are weird, they could be right. Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 These debates are a spectator sport, not an epistemic tool. Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Mixed Factual 26 Sep 2026 Nuclear doomsday scenarios in the 1960s set off an arms race with the Soviets rather than disarmament. Factual · 26 Sep 2026 Philosophy, ethics and society
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 When I said that the doomer scenarios projected alpha-male psychology onto AIs, this was not an ad hominem insinuation that the proponents… Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Not researched Factual 26 Sep 2026 Pinker's 2018 book Enlightenment Now contains a 31-page chapter titled "Existential Risk," which is his principal contribution to mass discourse on existential risk. Factual · 26 Sep 2026 Their own work or organisation
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 I stand by my claim that most of the doomer scenarios are preposterous (beginning with the AI paperclip maximiser that consumes our bodies… Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 But as rationalists we should agree that attacking an idea should not be confused with attacking a person. Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 So let me begin by apologising for any inadvertent offence and by emphasising that my admiration for you is immense. Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 Obviously I believe in defending ideas in the face of criticism. Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 It was an analysis which proposed that they were applying an inappropriate alpha-male theory of mind (an intuitive psychology) to AI. Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 I think your brilliance is enviable and your integrity inspiring. Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Unresolvable Factual 26 Sep 2026 Steven Pinker has never criticised or publicly disagreed with Scott Alexander, nor called him names like "paranoid" or "weird moron." Factual · 26 Sep 2026 Their own work or organisation
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 We agree on almost everything, including your commitment to rationality and effective altruism (at least in their original, lower-case… Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 Nonetheless, I stand by them as substantive arguments against the radical claim (I trust you’ll agree that it is radical) that within a… Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Unresolvable Factual 26 Sep 2026 Pinker tweeted a New York Times article in which Cal Newport traced the history of AI doomerism to a Berkeley Rationalist subculture he called "weirder than we realize." Factual · 26 Sep 2026 AI safety and alignment
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 I’m just sceptical of the prophecy that AI will murder every last human and of the assumption that sowing such dread is the most effective… Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 And telling young people they will soon perish en masse has costs in their appreciation of the institutions of modernity, their mental… Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Resolved true Factual 26 Sep 2026 Pinker's arguments on AI risk were laid out five years before the release of LLM chatbots. Factual · 26 Sep 2026 Their own work or organisation
Not researched Factual 26 Sep 2026 Steven Pinker has taken part in only one formal public debate, alongside Matt Ridley against Malcolm Gladwell and Alain de Botton. Factual · 26 Sep 2026 Their own work or organisation
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 I choose to delope: to fire my pistol into the ground to pre-empt the conflict. Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 I boosted the article because it addresses legitimate questions. Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Unresolvable Factual 26 Sep 2026 Pinker argued in Enlightenment Now that self-preservation and dominance motives come bundled with intelligence in humans due to natural selection but are not inherent to engineered intelligent systems. Factual · 26 Sep 2026 AI safety and alignment
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 It’s consistent with my argument in Enlightenment Now that prophecies of doom are not effective responses to genuine risks but have… Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 But the AI X-Risk community itself is facetious about what they insist will be a massacre of humanity (the paperclip memes, the jocular… Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Mostly true Factual 26 Sep 2026 Pinker said he had argued that any intelligent system is a mechanism good at solving some problems but not others, and that it is inherently limited by knowledge about the world attainable only through observation and experimentation. Factual · 26 Sep 2026 AI safety and alignment
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 The dangers of AI are real, including bioterrorism, cyber-sabotage, and unconstrained agents. Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 these are not aspersions on living people, but on the hypothetical protagonists of the exotic scenarios. Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Not researched Factual 26 Sep 2026 Frontier AI companies, led by alumni of the X-risk community, have released LLMs in a breakneck and sometimes irresponsible way that Pinker did not anticipate. Factual · 26 Sep 2026 AI policy and governance
Mostly true Factual 26 Sep 2026 The capabilities of LLMs trained on huge datasets are more general than Pinker and almost everyone else would have guessed at the time he laid out his arguments, five years before LLM chatbots were released. Factual · 26 Sep 2026 AI capabilities
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 And the adjectives were not gratuitous insults but juxtaposed as antonyms to the “intelligence” in “artificial intelligence.” Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 I’m strongly in favour of sober safety evaluations and engineering best practices: independent oversight, mandatory investigations of… Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Not researched Factual 26 Sep 2026 Pinker argued in Enlightenment Now that trading off multiple competing goals is the essence of intelligence, so no genuine AI would cause the havoc imagined in doomer scenarios. Factual · 26 Sep 2026 AI safety and alignment
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Sep 2026 I confess that my tone can be irreverent and my prose purplish, which you suggest is incommensurate with the gravity of the topic. Not checkable · 26 Sep 2026
Unresolvable Factual 26 Sep 2026 Pinker's counterargument to the criticism that the Enlightenment and the ideal of progress would lead to human extinction, for example through runaway AI, said nothing about maleness, polyamory, paranoia or similar irrelevancies. Factual · 26 Sep 2026 Their own work or organisation
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 If they try to enforce the letter of the law, it would be too much like a police state. Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Mostly true Factual 24 Sep 2025 Harvard does not admit students on meritocratic grounds. Factual · 24 Sep 2025 Philosophy, ethics and society
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 There are other things where it’s not inexorable, it’s not monotonic, but it certainly seems to have a direction. Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Own records only Factual 24 Sep 2025 Pinker gives many more A grades than he used to, to avoid an empty lecture hall. Factual · 24 Sep 2025 Their own work or organisation
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 Again, since it depends on nothing but common expectations, it can unravel as when you have a big public demonstration where people see… Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 Not to mention that in all of the songs, there are some lyrics that are rather misogynistic by today’s contemporary standards, but somehow… Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 I think a lot of the shaming mobs, a lot of the trolling, a lot of the degradation of discourse in social media comes because of that… Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Unresolvable Prediction 24 Sep 2025 Pinker said he thinks a world war is less likely today than it was 100 years ago. Prediction · 24 Sep 2025 Other global risks
Mostly true Factual 24 Sep 2025 Some marine species, such as broadcast spawners, coordinate the release of gametes on the full moon or a fixed number of days after it. Factual · 24 Sep 2025 Science and research methods
Mostly true Factual 24 Sep 2025 Human sacrifice, once practised by all ancient civilizations, no longer exists today. Factual · 24 Sep 2025 Philosophy, ethics and society
Not researched Citation 24 Sep 2025 A corollary of Aumann's agreement theorem, possibly pointed out by Geanakoplos, is that rational agents should not engage in speculative trade. Citation · 24 Sep 2025 Economics and markets
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 I suggest that eye contact is an instant common knowledge generator. Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Mixed Factual 24 Sep 2025 More countries are democratic than not, though fewer than 20 years ago. Factual · 24 Sep 2025 Philosophy, ethics and society
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 It’s not particularly intuitive, in the same way that markets are not particularly intuitive, in the same way that science is not… Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 A Schelling point is a choice that people make to coordinate that has no intrinsic value other than the fact that everyone else knows that… Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Mostly true Factual 24 Sep 2025 Large language models have features, such as hidden layers, that implicitly build in some insights of linguistics. Factual · 24 Sep 2025 AI capabilities
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 You can’t reasonably expect to make a greater profit by speculating on private information. Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 I tend to think that our assessment of a work of art isn’t completely extricable from our knowledge of its provenance Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 No government can have snipers on every rooftop and telescreens in every room surveilling you 24/7 with the Stasi ready to pounce on you if… Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 When it comes to just preferences, I don’t think that priors apply or are even meaningful. Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 There needn’t be any predictability from outsiders other than it’s likely to pop into the mind of the people involved. Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Not researched Factual 24 Sep 2025 The war in Ukraine is not as bad as World War I. Factual · 24 Sep 2025 Other global risks
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 If there wasn’t some suspicion, the weapons would be useless because they wouldn’t be a deterrent. Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 there can be no element of just raw subjective preference. Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 Everyone knows that everyone knows that money has value. That’s what gives it value, as long as they do. Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 I guess I’ll say not gone forever, but certainly in retreat. Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 I suggest that human relationships like friendship, like authority, like romance, like transaction partners are all coordination games that… Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 Those assumptions are seldom satisfied, but if they are satisfied, then yes. Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 In cases where there’s doubt as to whether this signal has been received or how it’s interpreted, or where there’s no way in which you can… Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 I’m one of those freaks who just does not enjoy the taste of chocolate. Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 24 Sep 2025 That’s probably what happens most of the time. Not checkable · 24 Sep 2025
Back to the list

Not checkable

“I think it’s illicit to anthropomorphise AI as being like humans, which are products of natural selection, when AIs are not products of natural selection; they’re products of intelligent design.”

Steven Pinker 7 October 2026 Steven Pinker on AI Doom and Consciousness (Conspicuous Cognition)

I think it’s illicit to anthropomorphise AI as being like humans, which are products of natural selection, when AIs are not products of…

Not checkable An opinion, value judgement or statement with nothing to check.

Cite this claim

Steven Pinker, “I think it’s illicit to anthropomorphise AI as being like humans, which are products of natural selection, when AIs are not products of…” (said 7 October 2026). Verdict: not checkable. Reliability API, claim c_aaf4bbc77961, method 0.1.0+28da144b. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_aaf4bbc77961

Claims without a verdict

Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Steven Pinker? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.