Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
73 67 79 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Insufficient record: 0 predictions resolved, 5 needed for a score.
-
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 0 promises resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 73 (likely 67 to 79, high confidence), from 94 claims: 94 factual claims. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Nassim Taleb's claims
13 claims
“A sharp reduction in this supply would trigger hyperinflation, owing to the nonlinear effects of such squeezes. Remember 2022.”
Nassim Taleb, speaking at Ron Paul Institute meeting 24 September 2025 Black Swan author Nassim Taleb says your city's new bike lane is the reason the economy sucks (Fortune)
A sharp reduction in immigrant labor supply to the U.S. and Europe would trigger hyperinflation due to nonlinear squeeze effects.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Reasoning
Conditional hypothetical with no horizon and no defined 'sharp reduction'.
Cite this claim
Nassim Taleb, “A sharp reduction in immigrant labor supply to the U.S. and Europe would trigger hyperinflation due to nonlinear squeeze effects.” (said 24 September 2025). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_c26f05819f8e, method 0.1.0+28da144b. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_c26f05819f8e
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Nassim Taleb? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.