Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
72 65 79 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
66 54 78 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 1 promise resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 71 (likely 64 to 77, high confidence), from 79 claims: 60 factual claims, 19 predictions. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Balaji Srinivasan's claims
21 claims
“2028: blue and red against tech”
Balaji Srinivasan, writing on X 30 November 2025 Post by @balajis on X, 2025-11-30 (X)
In the 2028 US election, the blue (Democratic) and red (Republican) sides will align against tech.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Reasoning
deadline 2028 is after 2026-11-04
Cite this claim
Balaji Srinivasan, “In the 2028 US election, the blue (Democratic) and red (Republican) sides will align against tech.” (said 30 November 2025). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_7ef52977edc5, method 0.1.0+c876030c. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_7ef52977edc5
Claims without a verdict
- Unresolvable 148
- Not yet due 21
- Own records only 2
- Not researched 227
- Not checkable 1,091
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Balaji Srinivasan? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.