The real action in AI will be in finding theoretically sound ways of combining symbolic and deep learning traditions.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
Vague prediction with no horizon about where the real action will be.
Cite this claim
Gary Marcus, “The real action in AI will be in finding theoretically sound ways of combining symbolic and deep learning traditions.” (said 14 November 2019). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_f6be560bcd5d, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_f6be560bcd5d
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Gary Marcus
-
Mostly true
“Some of its advice will be head-scratchingly bad.”
-
Mostly true
“GPT-5 will surely be better, a lot better than GPT-4.”
-
Resolved true
“GPT-5 really is about to drop, no foolin’.”
-
Resolved true
“It will still make a significant number of shake-your-head stupid errors, in ways that are hard to fully predict.”
GPT-5 will still make a significant number of obvious errors that are hard to predict.
-
Mostly true
“Neurosymbolic AI will become much more prominent.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.