A ten-year pause in AI development would be very difficult because other countries would keep developing these models, people might break the law, and the economic pressure would be enormous.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
Hypothetical about a ten-year pause cannot be tested.
Cite this claim
Dario Amodei, “A ten-year pause in AI development would be very difficult because other countries would keep developing these models, people might break the law, and the economic pressure would be enormous.” (said 12 April 2024). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_e63779694bcf, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_e63779694bcf
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Dario Amodei
-
Mostly true
“We're gonna be fine. The-- the impact of this designation is fairly small.”
-
Resolved true
“Probably the export controls may even have, you know, the impact of stimulating China.”
US export controls may have the effect of stimulating China's chip development.
-
Mostly true
“AI seems likely to enable much better propaganda and surveillance, both major tools in the autocrat’s toolkit.”
-
Mostly false
“We believe AI for biology is on a similar exponential trend.”
-
Resolved false
“where AI is writing 90 percent of the code”
Within three to six months of March 2025, AI will be writing 90 percent of code.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.