ClaimsRay Kurzweil

“I come up with thousands of trillions of bytes of information to characterize what’s in a brain, which is millions of times greater than what is in the genome.”

Ray Kurzweil, essay author 12 December 2002 The Intelligent Universe (Kurzweil Library) archived copy

Factual Science and research methods

Kurzweil estimates the brain's information content at thousands of trillions of bytes, millions of times greater than the genome.

Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.

Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?

The second judge would not resolve this claim; the verdict shown is the first judge's.

The evidence is the person's or their organisation's own records.

What would count as true or false

This is a claim about Kurzweil's own estimate, judged as of December 2002. True if his published writings or talks from around that time give an estimate of the brain's information content in the range of thousands of trillions of bytes (about 10^15–10^18) and describe it as millions of times greater than the genome. On standard figures the genome holds about 750 MB, or 30–100 MB compressed, so a ratio in the millions is consistent with those numbers. Mostly true if he gave the estimate but the figure or ratio differs a little from the quote, for example a different order of magnitude in one of the two parts. Mixed if only one of the two elements (the brain estimate or the comparison with the genome) appears in his work. Mostly false if his stated estimate was materially different. False if he made no such estimate.

Set before the research began.

Evidence (4)

  1. E1 Ray Kurzweil Reader (PDF, KurzweilAI.net essays 2001-2003): Dialogue Between Ray Kurzweil, Eric Drexler, and Robert Bradbury KurzweilAI.net / The Kurzweil Library · 3 December 2002 Own record

    “we have 1016 bytes, considerably more than the 109bytes that you mentioned.”
  2. E2 Ray Kurzweil Reader (PDF, KurzweilAI.net essays 2001-2003): Dialogue Between Ray Kurzweil, Eric Drexler, and Robert Bradbury KurzweilAI.net / The Kurzweil Library · 3 December 2002 Own record

    “Published on KurzweilAI.net December 3, 2002. E-mail dialogue on November 23, 2002.”
  3. E3 Ray Kurzweil Reader (PDF, KurzweilAI.net essays 2001-2003) KurzweilAI.net / The Kurzweil Library Own record

    “The interconnection data alone is a million times greater than the information in the genome.”
  4. E4 Ray Kurzweil Reader (PDF, KurzweilAI.net essays 2001-2003) KurzweilAI.net / The Kurzweil Library Own record

    “There are about 800 million bytes in the uncompressed genome.”

Reasoning

In an email dialogue with Eric Drexler and Robert Bradbury published on KurzweilAI.net on December 3, 2002 (E1, E2), Kurzweil gives a figure of 10^16 bytes, considerably more than a 10^9-byte figure the other party had mentioned. 10^16 bytes is in the 10^15–10^18 range the criteria set. In the same collection of his writings, Kurzweil says the brain's interconnection data alone is a million times greater than the information in the genome (E3), and he puts the uncompressed genome at about 800 million bytes (E4). Together these match both parts of the quoted estimate. All of this comes from Kurzweil's own published writings, which is the relevant record for a claim about his own estimate.

Cite this claim

Ray Kurzweil, “Kurzweil estimates the brain's information content at thousands of trillions of bytes, millions of times greater than the genome.” (said 12 December 2002). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_d73cdfd26b22, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_d73cdfd26b22

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Ray Kurzweil, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

More factual claims by Ray Kurzweil

  1. Mostly false Factual 9 July 2024
    “Right now, you’re getting back about four months a year.”

    Currently scientific progress gives back about four months of life expectancy per year.

  2. Mostly false Factual 9 July 2024
    “And then AlphaFold 2 in 2022 went through 200 million proteins and got the shape exactly correct, and that’s going to help come up with new medications.”

    AlphaFold 2 in 2022 went through 200 million proteins and got their shapes exactly correct, which will help produce new medications.

  3. Resolved true Factual 9 July 2024
    “As of two or three years ago, we had gone through 170,000 proteins.”

    As of two or three years ago, 170,000 proteins had been worked through by people.

  4. Mixed Factual May 2020
    “The current method for testing these few treatments is to organize a few hundred human subjects and then test them over about a year and a half, at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars.”

    The current method for testing the few treatments that are tried organizes a few hundred human subjects and tests them over about a year and a half, at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars.

  5. Mostly true Factual May 2020
    “Very often, the first several solutions tested on humans are not ideal and lead to other solutions that also take a few years to develop and test.”

    Very often the first several solutions tested on humans are not ideal and lead to other solutions that also take a few years to develop and test.

All of them

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.