AlphaFold 2 in 2022 went through 200 million proteins and got their shapes exactly correct, which will help produce new medications.
Mostly false False in substance, right in a detail.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
What would count as true or false
Three elements: (1) AlphaFold 2 in 2022 processed ~200 million proteins; (2) it got their shapes 'exactly correct'; (3) this will help produce new medications. True if DeepMind records confirm the ~200 million figure and 2022 timing, the predictions are described as highly/exactly accurate, and the medical-application claim is supported. Note the released database (~200M structures) was published mid-2022. Mostly true if the 200M/2022 facts hold but 'exactly correct' is a reasonable lay overstatement of high (not literally perfect) accuracy. Mixed if roughly half the elements hold. Mostly false if the core numbers are right but 'exactly correct' materially distorts AlphaFold's actual accuracy (predictions are confidence-scored, not verified exact). False if the 200M figure or 2022 timing is wrong.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (4)
-
E1 AlphaFold predicts structure of almost every catalogued protein known to science | EMBL EMBL · 28 July 2022
“The database is being expanded by approximately 200 times, from nearly 1 million protein structures to over 200 million, covering almost every organism on Earth that has had its genome sequenced.”
-
E2 AlphaFold predictions are valuable hypotheses and ... Nature Methods (Springer Nature) · 30 November 2023
“Our results also show that even very high-confidence AlphaFold predictions differ from corresponding models deposited in the PDB by about twice as much as pairs of high-resolution structures in the PDB that were crystallized in different space groups”
-
E3 AlphaFold predictions are valuable hypotheses and ... Nature Methods (Springer Nature) · 30 November 2023
“AlphaFold predictions have already been made available for 200 million individual protein sequences to further drug discovery and protein engineering and to understand biology”
-
E4 Researchers Assess AlphaFold Model Accuracy - Biosciences Area Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Biosciences Area · 23 January 2024
“which makes those parts of the predicted models unusable for detailed analyses such as those needed for drug discovery.”
Reasoning
E1, dated July 2022, confirms that the AlphaFold database grew to more than 200 million predicted protein structures that year, so the number and the timing hold. E3 says the predictions were released to support drug discovery, which backs the medical-use part in general terms. However, E2, a peer-reviewed study, found that even very high-confidence AlphaFold predictions differ from the experimentally determined structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) by about twice as much as two independent experimental structures of the same protein differ from each other. E4 adds that parts of some predicted models are unusable for detailed work such as drug discovery. With the core facts right but "exactly correct" misstating what are confidence-scored predictions, the criteria point to mostly false.
Cite this claim
Ray Kurzweil, “AlphaFold 2 in 2022 went through 200 million proteins and got their shapes exactly correct, which will help produce new medications.” (said 9 July 2024). Verdict: mostly false. Reliability API, claim c_c28fe75a78c1, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_c28fe75a78c1
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Ray Kurzweil
-
Mostly false
“Right now, you’re getting back about four months a year.”
Currently scientific progress gives back about four months of life expectancy per year.
-
Resolved true
“As of two or three years ago, we had gone through 170,000 proteins.”
As of two or three years ago, 170,000 proteins had been worked through by people.
-
Mixed
“The current method for testing these few treatments is to organize a few hundred human subjects and then test them over about a year and a half, at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars.”
-
Mostly true
“Very often, the first several solutions tested on humans are not ideal and lead to other solutions that also take a few years to develop and test.”
-
Mostly true
“Argonne National Lab has used five of the world’s most powerful supercomputers to narrow a billion molecules down to a few thousand.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.