ClaimsNassim Taleb

“The first 40 pages explains skin in the game.”

Nassim Taleb, interviewee 10 July 2017 Nassim Nicholas Taleb on Work, Slavery, the Minority Rule, and Skin in the Game (EconTalk) archived copy

Factual Their own work or organisation

The first 40 pages of the Skin in the Game manuscript explain skin in the game.

Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.

Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?

Reasoning

Only Taleb's own manuscript drafts could show what its first 40 pages contained.

Cite this claim

Nassim Taleb, “The first 40 pages of the Skin in the Game manuscript explain skin in the game.” (said 10 July 2017). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_d7151761cdaa, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_d7151761cdaa

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Nassim Taleb, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

More factual claims by Nassim Taleb

  1. Mostly true Factual 21 September 2025
    “adds 3 chapters and an appendix on Max Entropy distributions (includes Tsallis Entropy).”

    The 3rd edition of Statistical Consequences of Fat Tails is available and adds 3 chapters and an appendix on Max Entropy distributions including Tsallis Entropy.

  2. Resolved true Factual 18 March 2024
    “Just to remind people that I have NOTHING to do with "nassimtaleb. org"”

    Nassim Taleb has no connection to the website "nassimtaleb.org".

  3. Resolved true Factual 2023
    “We respond to Tetlock et al. (2022) showing 1)”

    The paper responds to Tetlock et al. (2022). (2022).

  4. Resolved true Factual November 2021
    “I am writing these lines from the vantage point of my specialty of decision making under uncertainty, not that of theology”

    The author's specialty is decision making under uncertainty, not theology.

  5. Mostly true Factual 29 December 2020
    “This part in Fooled by Randomness was inspired by the psychology of depositors in #Lebanon who enjoyed steady AND high returns.”

    A part of Fooled by Randomness was inspired by the psychology of Lebanese depositors who enjoyed steady and high returns.

All of them

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.